首页> 外文期刊>Anaesthesia >Recombinant activated protein C usage in Scotland: a comparison with published guidelines and a survey of attitudes?
【24h】

Recombinant activated protein C usage in Scotland: a comparison with published guidelines and a survey of attitudes?

机译:苏格兰重组活化蛋白C的使用:与已发布指南的比较和态度调查?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Severe sepsis is a common cause of admission to the intensive care unit and is associated with a high hospital mortality. This audit explored the current use of, and attitudes towards, recombinant activated protein C therapy across Scotland, and compared these with current guidance. Patients with severe sepsis were followed for three days. Consideration and/or usage of recombinant activated protein C were compared with two different guidelines. Ninety-seven patients were admitted to the intensive care unit over the audit period. Recombinant activated protein C was used in nine of these patients. Depending on the criteria used, between 50% and 81% of the patients who qualified for recombinant activated protein C therapy did not receive it. Subsequent to the audit, a survey was performed to study intensive care unit consultants’ attitudes to recombinant activated protein C therapy. A total of 125 consultants responded to the survey (77%). Of these, 104 (83%) stated that they used recombinant activated protein C in their clinical practice, 56 (52%) of whom prescribed it to patients with two-organ failures and an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of ≥?25. Thirty-nine respondents (38%) stated that two-organ failures alone would be an adequate trigger for therapy. We conclude that recombinant activated protein C is potentially under-used to treat severe sepsis. Many consultants seem to reserve the drug for the most severely ill sub group of patients.
机译:严重的败血症是重症监护病房的常见入院原因,并伴随着较高的医院死亡率。这次审核探讨了整个苏格兰目前对重组活化蛋白C治疗的使用和态度,并将其与当前指南进行了比较。严重脓毒症患者随访三天。将重组激活蛋白C的考虑和/或用法与两种不同的指南进行了比较。在审核期间,有97名患者被送入重症监护室。其中九名患者使用了重组活化蛋白C。根据使用的标准,符合重组活化蛋白C治疗资格的患者中有50%至81%没有接受治疗。审核之后,进行了一项调查,以研究重症监护病房顾问对重组活化蛋白C治疗的态度。共有125位顾问回答了该调查(77%)。其中有104名(83%)表示他们在临床实践中使用了重组活化蛋白C,其中56名(52%)向患有双器官功能衰竭且急性生理和慢性健康评估II分数≥?的患者开具了重组激活蛋白C。 25三十九名受访者(38%)表示,仅两器官衰竭将足以触发治疗。我们得出的结论是,重组激活的蛋白C可能未充分用于治疗严重的败血症。许多顾问似乎将药物保留给病情最严重的亚组患者。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Anaesthesia》 |2012年第1期|43-50|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Consultant;

    Senior Lecturer and Honorary Consultant Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Glasgow Royal Infirmary Glasgow Scotland;

    Consultant Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Crosshouse Hospital Kilmarnock Scotland;

    Specialty Registrar Anaesthesia and Critical Care Ninewells Hospital Dundee Scotland;

    Specialist Registrar Anaesthesia Victoria Infirmary Glasgow Scotland;

    Consultant Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Western Infirmary Glasgow Scotland;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号