首页> 外文期刊>America's Network >Could Trinko bring down the Bells?
【24h】

Could Trinko bring down the Bells?

机译:Trinko可以放下钟声吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Until last month, only diehard antitrust experts knew much about Trinko vs. Bell Atlantic, an obscure antitrust case that had reached the 2nd Circuit Court in New York. Back in March 2000, the former Bell Atlantic encountered problems with one of its operations support systems that accepted orders from competitors. The Federal Communications Commission issued a consent decree in which Bell Atlantic agreed to pay $10 million in compensation to affected competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs). One day later, however, attorney Curtis Trinko, a customer of AT&T, filed a lawsuit against the Bell on behalf of AT&T consumers, claiming that it was harming customers by denying AT&T access to Bell Atlantic's network.
机译:直到上个月,只有顽固的反托拉斯专家才对Trinko诉Bell Atlantic一案知之甚少,这是一个晦涩的反托拉斯案件,已送达纽约第二巡回法院。早在2000年3月,前贝尔大西洋公司的一个运营支持系统就遇到了问题,该系统接受了竞争对手的订单。联邦通讯委员会(Federal Communications Commission)发布了一项同意令,贝尔大西洋(Bell Atlantic)同意向受影响的竞争性本地交易所(CLEC)支付1000万美元的赔偿。但是一天后,AT&T客户的律师Curtis Trinko代表AT&T消费者对Bell提起诉讼,声称这是通过拒绝AT&T访问Bell Atlantic网络来损害客户。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号