首页> 外文期刊>American Water Works Association Journal >Evaluation of arsenic field test kits for drinking water analysis
【24h】

Evaluation of arsenic field test kits for drinking water analysis

机译:砷现场测试试剂盒用于饮用水分析的评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Seven arsenic field test kits were evaluated for their ability to detect arsenic Ⅲ, Ⅴ, and a combination of species, and their performance was compared with that of graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Performance was evaluated for precision, accuracy, matrix effects, linearity, operator bias, and ease of use. Precision, determined by standard deviation, was relatively good for all test kits. However, accuracy, as calculated using percent recoveries, varied greatly among the test kits. Matrix effects were evaluated using known additions of sulfide and antimony in reagent water. Field samples were also tested at various arsenic concentrations to determine performance throughout the working range (linearity) of the test kits. Results indicated that two of the seven field test kits met acceptable criteria of accuracy, precision, linearity, expense, and ease of use as defined by the authors. Given the varied performance among the testing kits, the authors concluded that water professionals should be cautious in choosing field test kits for noncompliance analyses.
机译:评价了7种砷现场测试试剂盒检测Ⅲ,Ⅴ和几种砷的能力,并将其性能与石墨炉原子吸收分光光度法进行了比较。对性能进行了评估,包括精度,准确性,基质效应,线性,操作员偏倚和易用性。由标准偏差确定的精度对于所有测试套件都相对较好。但是,使用回收率百分比计算得出的准确性在测试套件之间差异很大。使用已知的试剂水中的硫化物和锑添加物评估基体效应。还以各种砷浓度对现场样品进行了测试,以确定在测试套件的整个工作范围(线性)中的性能。结果表明,七个现场测试套件中有两个符合作者定义的可接受的准确性,精确度,线性,费用和易用性标准。鉴于测试套件的性能各不相同,作者得出结论,水专业人员应谨慎选择用于不合格分析的现场测试套件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号