首页> 外文期刊>The American Sociologist >On the Necessity of Re-engaging the Classical Greek and Latin Literatures: Lessons from Emile Durkheim’s The Evolution of Educational Thought
【24h】

On the Necessity of Re-engaging the Classical Greek and Latin Literatures: Lessons from Emile Durkheim’s The Evolution of Educational Thought

机译:重新参与古典希腊和拉丁文学的必要性:埃米尔·杜克海姆(Emile Durkheim)的《教育思想的演变》中的教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although much overlooked by both sociologists and educators, Emile Durkheim’s The Evolution of Educational Thought (EET; lectures from 1904–1905) not only provides extended insight into the developmental flows and disjunctures of Western education and scholarship from the classical Greek era to Durkheim’s own time but also indicates the fundamentally sociological nature of these transformations. As well, and in contrast to the more heavily structuralist, Cartesian rationalist approach that Durkheim adopts in his earlier, better known works (especially The Division of Labor in Society, Rules of the Sociological Method, and Suicide), Durkheim’s EET may be better characterized as a historically informed, sociological pragmatist approach to the study of education as a humanly engaged process. Given the extended amount of material covered in EET and the necessity of establishing in some detail Durkheim’s position on the development of educational thought over the preceding 2000 years, it has been necessary to divide this material into smaller packages for the purpose of presentation. In the first six chapters of EET Durkheim addresses (a) the Greek and Latin foundations of educational thought in France, (b) the role that the early Christian church assumed in shaping and preserving education and scholarship, and (c) the nature and emphasis of the Carolingian Renaissance (8th and 9th centuries), along with its relevance for the development of universities in Europe. Following (1) an introduction to Durkheim’s EET, (2) a synopsis of the first six chapters of EET, and (3) a highly compacted overview of the remaining 21 chapters of this volume, this paper concludes with (4) a commentary on the necessity of attending to the historical development of Western social thought for a sociological analysis of knowing and acting. An epilogue briefly considers (5) some ways that sociologists, classicists, and other students of the human condition may contribute to this exceptionally consequential venture
机译:尽管社会学家和教育工作者都忽略了这一点,但埃米尔·迪克海姆(Emile Durkheim)的《教育思想的演变》(EET; 1904-1905年的演讲)不仅提供了对从古典希腊时代到涂尔干时代的西方教育和学术发展流向和分离的深入了解。但也表明了这些转变的根本社会学性质。同样,与涂尔干在早期更广为人知的作品(尤其是社会劳动分工,社会学方法规则和自杀)中采用的笛卡尔理性主义者的结构主义方法相比,涂尔干的EET可能具有更好的特征。作为一种历史悠久的,社会学的实用主义方法,把教育研究作为人类参与的过程。鉴于EET中涵盖的材料数量越来越多,并且有必要在更详细的方面确定涂尔干在2000年前的教育思想发展中的立场,出于展示的目的,有必要将这些材料分成较小的包装。在EET涂尔干大学的前六章中,论述了(a)法国教育思想的希腊语和拉丁语基础,(b)早期基督教教会在塑造和保存教育和奖学金方面所扮演的角色,以及(c)性质和重点加洛林文艺复兴(8世纪和9世纪),以及它与欧洲大学发展的相关性。继(1)介绍涂尔干大学的EET,(2)对EET前六章的提要以及(3)对本书其余21章的高度紧凑的概述之后,本文以(4)对参加西方社会思想的历史发展,对知识和行为进行社会学分析的必要性。结语简要地考虑了(5)社会学家,古典主义者和其他人类状况学生在某些方面可能促成这种异常后果的冒险的方式

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号