首页> 外文期刊>American Law and Economics Review >Case Dismissed: Police Discretion and Racial Differences in Dismissals of Felony Charges
【24h】

Case Dismissed: Police Discretion and Racial Differences in Dismissals of Felony Charges

机译:案件被驳回:警察的自由裁量权和驳回重罪指控的种族差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Prior research has produced conflicting evidence of racial profiling during traffic stops. We instead analyze rates of case dismissal against felony arrestees by race. Superficial bias based on “unobservables” should be reduced because of the evidentiary requirements and nonnegligible costs of filing charges. Nonetheless, using data from over 58,000 US felony cases from 1990 to 1998, our probit analysis finds higher rates of dismissals for blacks for the subset of crimes that rely on police to make snap judgments. This suggests there may be more aggressive policing of blacks in these situations. Case dismissal rates are also elevated for both whites and blacks when blacks are underrepresented on local police forces.
机译:先前的研究得出了交通停靠期间种族特征描述的矛盾证据。相反,我们按种族分析针对重罪被捕者的案件解雇率。由于证据要求和提交费用不可忽略的因素,应减少基于“不可观察”的表面偏见。但是,根据1990年至1998年美国58,000多个重罪案件的数据,我们的概率分析发现,依靠警察做出迅速判决的部分犯罪案件中,黑人被解雇的比例更高。这表明在这种情况下,黑人可能会有更积极的警务。当黑人在当地警察部队中的代表人数不足时,白人和黑人的案件驳回率也将提高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号