...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Neuroradiology >Effects of Number of Diffusion Gradient Directions on Derived Diffusion Tensor Imaging Indices in Human Brain
【24h】

Effects of Number of Diffusion Gradient Directions on Derived Diffusion Tensor Imaging Indices in Human Brain

机译:扩散梯度方向数对人脑衍生扩散张量成像指标的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The effects of a number of diffusion-encoding gradient directions (NDGD) on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) indices have been studied previously with theoretic analysis and numeric simulations. In this study, we made in vivo measurements in the human brain to compare different clinical scan protocols and to evaluate their effects on the calculated DTI indices. METHODS: Fifteen healthy volunteers were scanned with a 1.5T MR scanner. Single-shot DTI images were acquired using 3 protocols different in NDGD and number of excitations (NEX) for each direction (NDGD/NEX = 6/10, 21/3, 31/2). Means and standard error of mean (SEM) were calculated and compared in 6 regions of interest (ROIs) for mean diffusivity (), fractional anisotropy (FA), diffusion tensor eigenvalues (1, 2, and 3), and correlation coefficients (r) of these indices among the 3 DTI protocols. RESULTS: At the ROI level, no significant differences were found for the mean and SEM of and FA among protocols (P > .05). The 6-NDGD protocol, however, yielded higher values for 1 and 2 and lower values for 3 in most ROIs (P < .05) compared with the other protocols. At the voxel level, the correlation between the protocols r21–31 were higher than r6–21 and r6–31 in most ROIs. The correlation of FA among 3 protocols also increased with increasing anisotropy. CONCLUSION: For ROI analyses, different NDGDs lead to similar values of FA and but different eigenvalues. However, different NDGDs at the voxel level provide varying values. The selection of the NDGD, therefore, should depend on the focus of different DTI applications.
机译:背景与目的:先前已通过理论分析研究了许多扩散编码 梯度方向(NDGD)对扩散张量成像(DTI) 指标的影响。 和数值模拟。在这项研究中,我们在人脑中进行了 体内测量,以比较不同的临床扫描协议 ,并评估它们对计算得出的DTI指数的影响。 MR扫描仪对15名健康志愿者进行了扫描。使用NDGD中不同的3种协议 和每个方向 (NDGD / NEX = 6 / 10、21 / 3, 31/2)。计算并在6个感兴趣的区域中对均值 (SEM)的均值和标准误差进行比较,比较其平均扩散率(),分数各向异性(FA), 扩散张量特征值( 1 2 3 )和相关性 系数(r)结果在3种DTI方案中的三个指标之间。 结果:在ROI级别上,方案之间的平均值和SEM均未发现 的显着差异(P> .05 )。 但是,6-NDGD协议为 1 2 产生了更高的值,而大多数ROI中的sub> 3 (P <.05)与其他协议相比 。在体素级别,协议r 21–31 之间的相关性 高于r 6–21 和在大多数投资回报率中,r 6-31 。随着各向异性的增加,3 协议之间FA的相关性也增加。 结论:对于ROI分析,不同的NDGD导致FA的 值相似,但不同的特征值但是,体素级别的不同 NDGD提供不同的值。因此,NDGD的选择 应该取决于不同的 DTI应用程序的重点。

著录项

  • 来源
    《American Journal of Neuroradiology 》 |2006年第8期| 00001776-00001781| 共6页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY;

    Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY;

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY;

    Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY;

    Department of Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY|Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号