首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Neuroradiology >Angle-Corrected Imaging Transcranial Doppler Sonography versus Imaging and Nonimaging Transcranial Doppler Sonography in Children with Sickle Cell Disease
【24h】

Angle-Corrected Imaging Transcranial Doppler Sonography versus Imaging and Nonimaging Transcranial Doppler Sonography in Children with Sickle Cell Disease

机译:镰状细胞病患儿的角度校正影像学经颅多普勒超声与影像学和非影像学经颅多普勒超声

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Nonimaging transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD) and imaging TCD (TCDI) are used for determination of the risk of stroke in children with sickle cell disease (SCD). The purpose was to compare angle-corrected, uncorrected TCDI, and TCD blood flow velocities in children with SCD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 37 children (mean age, 7.8 ± 3.0 years) without intracranial arterial narrowing determined with MR angiography, were studied with use of TCD and TCDI at the same session. Depth of insonation and TCDI mean velocities with and without correction for the angle of insonation in the terminal internal carotid artery (ICA) and middle (MCA), anterior (ACA), and posterior (PCA) cerebral arteries were compared with TCD velocities with use of a paired t test. RESULTS: Two arteries were not found on TCDI compared with 15 not found on TCD. Average angle of insonation in the MCA, ACA, ICA, and PCA was 31°, 44°, 25°, and 29°, respectively. TCDI and TCD mean depth of insonation for all arteries did not differ significantly; however, individual differences varied substantially. TCDI velocities were significantly lower than TCD velocities, respectively, for the right and left sides (mean ± SD): MCA, 106 ± 22 cm/s and 111 ± 33 cm/s versus 130 ± 19 cm/s and 134 ± 26 cm/s; ICA, 90 ± 14 cm/s and 98 ± 27 cm/s versus 117 ± 18 cm/s and 119 ± 23 cm/s; ACA, 74 ± 24 cm/s and 88 ± 25 cm/s versus 105 ± 23 cm/s and 105 ± 31 cm/s; and PCA, 84 ± 27 cm/s and 82 ± 21 cm/s versus 95 ± 23 cm/s and 94 ± 20 cm/s. TCD and angle-corrected TCDI velocities were not statistically different except for higher angle-corrected TCDI values in the left ACA and right PCA. CONCLUSION: TCD velocities are significantly higher than TCDI velocities but are not different from the angle-corrected TCDI velocities. TCDI identifies the major intracranial arteries more effectively than TCD.
机译:背景与目的:非影像经颅多普勒超声(TCD)和影像TCD(TCDI)用于确定镰状细胞性疾病(SCD)儿童的中风风险[Sup] 目的是比较SCD儿童的角度校正,未校正TCDI和 TCD血流速度。 材料和方法:研究了37例平均年龄为7.8 ±3.0岁的未通过MR血管造影确定的颅内动脉狭窄 的儿童,并采用TCD 和TCDI同一会话。超声深度和TCDI均 的速度,以及是否校正了颈内动脉终末(ICA)和中颈(MCA)的 结果:TCDI上未发现两个动脉与TCD上未找到的15 进行比较。 MCA,ACA, ICA和PCA的平均共鸣角分别为31°,44°,25°和29°。 TCDI和TCD的平均深度所有动脉的共鸣没有显着地 差异;但是,个体差异 基本不同。左右两侧的TCDI速度分别显着低于 TCD速度(平均值 ±SD):MCA,106±22 cm / s和111±33 < sup> cm / s对130±19 cm / s和134±26 cm / s; ICA, 90±14 cm / s和98±27 cm / s,而117± 18 cm / s和119±23 cm / s; ACA为74±24 cm / s和 88±25 cm / s,而105±23 cm / s和105± 31 cm / s;和PCA,分别为84±27 cm / s和82±21 cm / s 相对于95±23 cm / s和94±20 cm / s。除了左ACA 和右PCA中较高的角度校正TCDI值外,TCD和 角度校正的TCDI速度没有统计学差异。 > 结论:TCD速度明显高于TCDI 速度,但与角度校正的TCDI 速度没有区别。 TCDI识别主要颅内动脉 比TCD更有效。

著录项

  • 来源
    《American Journal of Neuroradiology》 |2007年第8期|00001613-00001618|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania|Hematology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa|Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdask, Gdask, Poland;

    Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania;

    Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania|Department of Neurology, Pozna? University of Medical Sciences, Pozna?, Poland;

    Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania;

    Divisions of Neurology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa;

    Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania|Hematology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa|Department of Radiology, Medical University of Gdask, Gdask, Poland;

    Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania;

    Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号