首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Neuroradiology >Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Compared with Optimal Pain Medication Treatment: Short-Term Clinical Outcome of Patients with Subacute or Chronic Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures. The VERTOS Study
【24h】

Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Compared with Optimal Pain Medication Treatment: Short-Term Clinical Outcome of Patients with Subacute or Chronic Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures. The VERTOS Study

机译:经皮椎体成形术与最佳疼痛药物治疗的比较:亚急性或慢性疼痛性骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折患者的短期临床疗效。 VERTOS研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess the short-term clinical outcome of patients with subacute or chronic painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (VCF) treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) compared with optimal pain medication (OPM). METHODS: Randomization of patients in 2 groups: treatment by PV or OPM. After 2 weeks, patients from the OPM arm could change therapy to PV. Patients were evaluated 1 day and 2 weeks after treatment. Visual analog score (VAS) for pain and analgesic use were assessed before, and 1 day and 2 weeks after start of treatment. Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO) and Roland-Morris Disability (RMD) questionnaire scores were assessed before and 2 weeks after start of treatment. Follow-up scores in patients requesting PV treatment after 2 weeks OPM treatment were compared with scores during their OPM period. RESULTS: Eighteen patients treated with PV compared with 16 patients treated with OPM had significantly better VAS and used less analgesics 1 day after treatment. Two weeks after treatment, the mean VAS was less but not significantly different in patients treated with OPM, whereas these patients used significantly less analgesics and had better QUALEFFO and RMD scores. Scores in the PV arm were influenced by occurrence of new VCF in 2 patients. After 2 weeks OPM, 14 patients requested PV treatment. All scores, 1 day and 2 weeks after PV, were significantly better compared with scores during conservative treatment. CONCLUSION: Pain relief and improvement of mobility, function, and stature after PV is immediate and significantly better in the short term compared with OPM treatment.
机译:目的:前瞻性评估经皮椎体成形术治疗的亚急性或慢性疼痛性骨质疏松椎体压缩性骨折(VCF)患者的短期临床结果 方法与最佳止痛药(OPM)进行比较。 方法:将两组患者随机分组: PV或OPM治疗。 2周后,OPM组的患者可以将 疗法改为PV。在 治疗后1天和2周对患者进行评估。在治疗开始前,治疗开始后1天和2周评估视觉模拟评分(VAS),以评估疼痛和镇痛效果。评估欧洲骨质疏松基金会(QUALEFFO)和Roland-Morris残疾 (RMD)的生活质量调查问卷评分,并在2周前评估 开始治疗后。 OPM治疗2周后要求 PV治疗的患者的随访评分与OPM期间的 得分进行比较。结果:18例接受OPM治疗的患者与OPM治疗的16 患者相比,PV治疗后1天的VAS明显更好,并且使用了更少的止痛药。治疗后两周, 接受OPM治疗的患者 的平均VAS较少但无显着差异,而这些患者使用的镇痛剂明显少QUALEFFO和RMD得分更高。 2名 患者中发生新的VCF影响了PV臂中的得分 。 OPM 2周后,有14例患者要求进行PV治疗。 PV后1天和2周的所有评分均 ,与保守治疗期间的评分相比明显更好。 / sup>结论:PV后即刻缓解疼痛并改善活动度,功能, 和身材,与OPM治疗相比, 在短期内显着改善。 < / sup>

著录项

  • 来源
    《American Journal of Neuroradiology》 |2007年第3期|00000555-00000560|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Radiology, St Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, the Netherlands;

    Department of Radiology, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, the Netherlands;

    Department of Radiology, St Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, the Netherlands;

    Departments of Radiology, Algemeen Ziekenhuis St Lucas, Gent, Belgium;

    Department of Radiology, St Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, the Netherlands;

    Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, the Netherlands;

    Department of Internal Medicine, St Elisabeth Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, the Netherlands;

    Department of Rheumatology, Algemeen Ziekenhuis St Lucas, Gent, Belgium;

    Department of Geriatric Medicine, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, the Netherlands;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:23:36

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号