首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Industrial Medicine >Occupational injuries among emergency responders†‡
【24h】

Occupational injuries among emergency responders†‡

机译:应急人员的职业伤害†

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BackgroundEmergency responders frequently incur injuries while providing medical, fire, and law enforcement services. National surveillance systems provide fragmented perspectives on responder injuries because they omit specific classes of workers (e.g., government or volunteers); they report only selected injuries; and employment information is incomplete.MethodsWe characterized injuries among emergency medical services (EMS), firefighting, and police occupations by using data from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System—Occupational Supplement (NEISS-Work) for injuries treated in U.S. hospital emergency departments in 2000–2001.ResultsSprains and strains were the leading injury (33–41%) among EMS, firefighter, and police occupations. Police officers and career firefighters had the highest injury rates (8.5 and 7.4 injuries per 100 full-time equivalent workers, respectively).ConclusionsThe physical demands of emergency response are a leading cause of injuries that may benefit from similar interventions across the occupations. To assess risk, improved exposure data need to be acquired, particularly for volunteers. Am. J. Ind. Med. 53:1–11, 2010. Published 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
机译:背景技术紧急响应人员在提供医疗,消防和执法服务时经常会受伤。国家监视系统由于缺少特定类别的工人(例如政府或志愿者)而提供了对响应者伤害的零散观点;他们只报告选定的伤害;方法我们通过使用国家电子伤害监测系统-职业补充(NEISS-Work)的数据对紧急医疗服务(EMS),消防和警察职业中的伤害进行了特征分析,该数据用于2000年美国医院急诊科治疗的伤害–2001年。结果扭伤和拉伤是EMS,消防员和警察职业中最主要的伤害(33–41%)。警察和职业消防员的受伤率最高(每100名全职同等工人分别受伤8.5和7.4)。结论紧急应变的身体要求是受伤的主要原因,而跨行业的类似干预措施可能会受益。为了评估风险,需要获取改善的暴露数据,尤其是对于志愿者。上午。 J.工业医学。 2010年53:1-11。发布于2009 Wiley-Liss,Inc.。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号