...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Epidemiology >Invited Commentary: Fewell and Colleagues—Fuel for Debate
【24h】

Invited Commentary: Fewell and Colleagues—Fuel for Debate

机译:特邀评论:费维尔和同事-辩论的燃料

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Concern over the impact of flawed measurement continues to nag epidemiology. Early studies indicated that the impact of measurement error is benign, leading generally only to attenuation of associations; more recent research has documented that this impact, especially within the setting of multivariate modeling, cannot be expected always to be benign. It can, for example, be a source of unsettling inconsistency. Fewell and colleagues (Am J Epidemiol 2007;166:646–655) show that residual confounding is especially persistent in the presence of multivariate confounding.
机译:对有缺陷的测量的影响的担忧继续困扰着流行病学。早期的研究表明,测量误差的影响是良性的,通常只会导致关联的减弱。最近的研究表明,这种影响,尤其是在多变量建模的情况下,不能总是预期是良性的。例如,它可能是造成不稳定的根源。 Fewell及其同事(Am J Epidemiol 2007; 166:646-655)表明,在存在多变量混杂的情况下,残留混杂尤其持久。

著录项

  • 来源
    《American Journal of Epidemiology》 |2007年第6期|656-658|共3页
  • 作者

    James Marshall;

  • 作者单位

    From the Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences Roswell Park Cancer Institute Buffalo NY;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号