...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Epidemiology >Overcoming Ecologic Bias using the Two-Phase Study Design
【24h】

Overcoming Ecologic Bias using the Two-Phase Study Design

机译:使用两阶段研究设计克服生态偏差

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Ecologic (aggregate) data are widely available and widely utilized in epidemiologic studies. However, ecologic bias, which arises because aggregate data cannot characterize within-group variability in exposure and confounder variables, can only be removed by supplementing ecologic data with individual-level data. Here the authors describe the two-phase study design as a framework for achieving this objective. In phase 1, outcomes are stratified by any combination of area, confounders, and error-prone (or discretized) versions of exposures of interest. Phase 2 data, sampled within each phase 1 stratum, provide accurate measures of exposure and possibly of additional confounders. The phase 1 aggregate-level data provide a high level of statistical power and a cross-classification by which individuals may be efficiently sampled in phase 2. The phase 2 individual-level data then provide a control for ecologic bias by characterizing the within-area variability in exposures and confounders. In this paper, the authors illustrate the two-phase study design by estimating the association between infant mortality and birth weight in several regions of North Carolina for 2000–2004, controlling for gender and race. This example shows that the two-phase design removes ecologic bias and produces gains in efficiency over the use of case-control data alone. The authors discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the approach.
机译:生态(汇总)数据可广泛用于流行病学研究中。但是,由于总数据不能描述暴露量和混杂变量的组内变异性而引起的生态偏差,只能通过用个体水平数据补充生态数据来消除。作者在此将两阶段研究设计描述为实现此目标的框架。在第1阶段,结果按感兴趣的区域,混杂因素和容易出错(或离散化)的版本的任意组合进行分层。在第1阶段的每个阶层中采样的第2阶段数据,可以提供暴露量以及可能的其他混杂因素的准确度量。第1阶段的汇总数据提供了较高的统计能力和交叉分类,通过该交叉分类,可以在第2阶段有效地对个体进行采样。然后,第2阶段的个体数据通过表征区域内的特征来为生态偏见提供控制。暴露和混杂因素的变异性。在本文中,作者通过估计2000-2004年北卡罗来纳州多个地区的婴儿死亡率和出生体重之间的关联,说明了性别和种族,说明了两阶段研究设计。此示例表明,与仅使用案例控制数据相比,两阶段设计消除了生态偏差并提高了效率。作者讨论了该方法的优缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号