...
首页> 外文期刊>American journal of enology & viticulture >Comparison Of Conventional Profiling By A Trained Tasting Panel And Free Profiling By Wine Professionals
【24h】

Comparison Of Conventional Profiling By A Trained Tasting Panel And Free Profiling By Wine Professionals

机译:经过培训的品酒小组的常规分析与葡萄酒专业人士的免费分析比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the wine industry, wine is often characterized by professional tasters. Methods commonly used in sensory analysis, or "conventional profiling," require intensive, experiment-specific training and thus cannot be applied by a panel of untrained tasters, even if they are wine professionals. More spontaneous methods such as free profiling do not require time-intensive training sessions. This study compares wine characterizations obtained through free profiling by wine professionals with conventional profiling by a panel of trained judges. Data were analyzed by multiple factor analysis. Representations provided by the two methods are broadly similar, but reveal some disparities. Free profiling may be a good compromise to obtain meaningful results from untrained but knowledgeable wine professionals.
机译:在葡萄酒行业,葡萄酒通常以专业的品酒师为特征。通常用于感官分析或“常规分析”的方法需要进行密集的,针对实验的培训,因此,即使他们是葡萄酒专业人士,也不能由未经培训的品尝者小组采用。诸如免费配置文件之类的更自发的方法不需要耗时的培训课程。这项研究比较了葡萄酒专业人士通过自由分析获得的葡萄酒特征与经过训练的法官小组进行的常规分析所获得的特征。通过多因素分析来分析数据。两种方法提供的表示形式大致相似,但存在一些差异。免费配置文件可能是一个不错的折衷方案,目的是从未经培训的但知识渊博的葡萄酒专业人士那里获得有意义的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号