首页> 外文期刊>The American Journal of Economics and Sociology >The Economics of Anti-Begging Regulations
【24h】

The Economics of Anti-Begging Regulations

机译:反乞讨规则的经济学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Supreme Court has ruled that asking for money is a form of protected speech. However, it has also ruled that restrictions on the time, place, and manner of begging are constitutional. This paper examines 71 U.S. cities to determine what factors influence a city's propensity to enact anti-begging regulations. The logistic regression results indicate that cities with higher welfare benefits are less likely to regulate begging. Cities with higher crime rates, higher proportions of disabled citizens, and higher proportions of college-educated citizens, and cities that are more densely populated are more likely to regulate begging. While historians, ethnographers, and legal scholars have studied issues related to begging, economists generally have not. This paper uses the traditional economic model of rational choice to examine why some U.S. cities regulate begging and others do not.
机译:最高法院裁定,索要金钱​​是受保护言论的一种形式。但是,它也裁定对时间,地点和乞讨方式的限制是符合宪法的。本文研究了美国的71个城市,以确定哪些因素会影响城市制定反乞讨法规的倾向。 Logistic回归结果表明,福利收益较高的城市调节乞讨的可能性较小。犯罪率较高,残疾人比例较高,受过大学教育的比例较高的城市以及人口密度较高的城市更有可能规范乞讨。历史学家,民族志学家和法律学者研究了与乞讨有关的问题,而经济学家通常没有。本文使用理性选择的传统经济模型来研究为什么某些美国城市监管乞讨而另一些城市则不这样做。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号