...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Agricultural Economics >Are “Decoupled” Farm Program Payments Really Decoupled? An Empirical Evaluation
【24h】

Are “Decoupled” Farm Program Payments Really Decoupled? An Empirical Evaluation

机译:“脱钩”的农场计划付款真的脱钩了吗?实证评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This analysis utilizes farm-level data to evaluate the extent to which U.S. farm program benefits, particularly direct payments, bring about distortions in production. The issue is important in WTO negotiations and in the debate over the distortionary effects of decoupled (“green-box”) payments. Our results suggest that the distortions brought about by AMTA payments, though statistically significant in some cases, are very modest. Larger effects are implied for market loss assistance payments. Probit models suggest that AMTA payments do not influence the likelihood that agents will acquire more land. Our results are reinforced using an aggregate county-level acreage model.
机译:该分析利用农场一级的数据来评估美国农场计划的收益(尤其是直接付款)在多大程度上导致生产扭曲。这个问题在世贸组织的谈判中以及在解耦(“绿箱”)付款的扭曲影响的辩论中都很重要。我们的结果表明,尽管在某些情况下具有统计意义,但AMTA付款带来的失真是非常适度的。市场损失援助金意味着更大的影响。概率模型表明,AMTA的付款不会影响代理商获得更多土地的可能性。我们使用县级总体种植面积模型来加强我们的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号