首页> 外文期刊>The American economic review >Comparing Apples to Oranges: Productivity Convergence and Measurement Across Industries and Countries: Reply
【24h】

Comparing Apples to Oranges: Productivity Convergence and Measurement Across Industries and Countries: Reply

机译:苹果与橙子的比较:各个行业和国家的生产率融合和评估:答复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The very useful and informative Comment by Anders Sφrensen(2001)questions the practice of Using expenditure-based, aggregate purchasing- Power parity(PPP)conversion factors to make Income or productivity comparisons across Countries at the sectoral levels. Sφrensen sug- Gests an easy-to-implement consistency check For the appropriateness of this approach:(rela- Tive)productivity levels should be invariant to The base year chosen for making the conver- Sions. With respect to the comparisons in Bernard and Jones(1996), Sφrensen then doc- Uments that this consistency check fails for the Manufacturing sector.
机译:AndersSφrensen(2001)的非常有用且内容丰富的评论质疑使用支出为基础的总购买力平价(PPP)转换因子进行部门间国家间收入或生产率比较的做法。 Sφrensen建议进行易于实施的一致性检查对于此方法的适当性:(相对)生产率水平应恒定不变,以选择进行转换的基准年。关于Bernard和Jones(1996)中的比较,Sφrensen随后指出,对于制造业而言,这种一致性检查失败。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号