首页> 外文期刊>The American economic review >The importance of Group Coverage: How Tax Policy Shaped U.S. Health Insurance
【24h】

The importance of Group Coverage: How Tax Policy Shaped U.S. Health Insurance

机译:团体保险的重要性:税收政策如何塑造美国健康保险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

First codified in 1954, the tax subsidy of employer contributions to employee health insurance plans is a major feature of the U.S. health insurance market. Using previously unexamined data from surveys collected just before and after the tax subsidy was enacted, this paper provides a unique examination of the effect of the tax subsidy on the demand for health insurance market. While the markets for health care and health insurance have changed significantly in the past 50 years, results in this paper may provide policy makers with an upper bound in determining how eliminating the tax subsidy will affect the demand for health insurance. The paper suggests that the tax subsidy led to a shift from individual to group insurance and increased the amount of health insurance coverage purchased by households, especially households with high marginal tax rates. After the implementation of the tax subsidy in 1954, employer contributions to group insurance were exempt from employee taxable income, so that the after-tax price of group insurance fell. As a result, the demand for group insurance increased. Households with group policies bought even greater amounts of coverage after the tax subsidy was enacted, and households with higher marginal tax rates were more likely to have group insurance than they did before 1954, and purchased greater amounts of coverage. Overall, results indicate that the tax subsidy increased the amount of coverage purchased by 9.5 percent, suggesting an elasticity of demand for health insurance coverage of -0.54. While this estimate is consistent with other elasticities calculated in the literature, it should be emphasized that given that the health care system has changed dramatically since 1954, it may only represent an upper bound as to what may happen if the tax subsidy were eliminated. Despite these shortcomings, the paper nonetheless offers guidance to policy makers, and perhaps makes an important point: that the tax subsidy did more than simply increase the dollar value of coverage purchased by households. It also engendered a shift from individual coverage to group policies, allowing more households to receive group insurance. Access to group insurance is a strong predictor of insurance coverage-then and now. Policies that examine how changes in the tax subsidy might affect levels of coverage should also study how access to group insurance may be affected by such changes.
机译:雇主对雇员健康保险计划缴纳的税收补贴于1954年首次制定,这是美国健康保险市场的主要特征。利用以前在税收补贴颁布之前和之后收集的调查中未经检验的数据,本文对税收补贴对健康保险市场需求的影响进行了独特的检验。尽管过去50年来医疗保健和健康保险的市场发生了巨大变化,但本文的结果可能为决策者提供一个上限,以确定取消税收补贴将如何影响健康保险的需求。该文件表明,税收补贴导致了个人保险向团体保险的转变,并增加了家庭(特别是边际税率高的家庭)购买的健康保险的覆盖范围。 1954年税收补贴实施后,雇主对团体保险的供款免于雇员应税收入,因此团体保险的税后价格下降。结果,团体保险的需求增加了。实行税收补贴后,具有团体政策的家庭购买了更大的保险,而边际税率较高的家庭比1954年之前购买团体保险的可能性更高,并且购买了更大的保险。总体而言,结果表明,税收补贴使购买的保险金额增加了9.5%,这表明健康保险承保需求的弹性为-0.54。尽管这一估计与文献中计算出的其他弹性是一致的,但应强调的是,鉴于自1954年以来医疗体系发生了巨大变化,它仅代表着取消税收补贴后可能会发生的上限。尽管存在这些缺点,但本文还是为决策者提供了指导,并且可能提出了一个重要的观点:税收补贴的作用不仅仅是增加家庭购买的保险的美元价值。它还导致了从个人保险向团体保险的转变,从而使更多的家庭可以享受团体保险。过去和现在,团体保险的获得是保险覆盖率的有力预测指标。审查税收补贴变化可能会如何影响承保范围的政策还应该研究此类变化如何影响团体保险的获取。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号