...
首页> 外文期刊>The American economic review >Return-to-Work Policies and Labor Supply in Disability Insurance Programs
【24h】

Return-to-Work Policies and Labor Supply in Disability Insurance Programs

机译:伤残保险计划的重返工作政策和劳动力供应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Disability Insurance (DI) programs are among the largest social assistance programs in developed countries. These programs provide benefits to individuals with health conditions that limit the amount or type of paid work they can perform. There have been concerns about the high levels of expenditure on DI programs. DI programs also have been criticized for inducing beneficiaries to reduce their labor supply. Most countries therefore have already implemented-or are considering implementing-policies to make their beneficiaries "return to work." These programs allow DI beneficiaries to collect all or a portion of their benefit while working. Although return-to-work policies intend to increase the labor supply in DI programs, the empirical evidence on the effectiveness of such policies is mixed. For example, Hoynes and Moffitt (1999); Benitez-Silva, Buchinsky, and Rust (2011); Weathers and Hemmeter (2011); and Butler et al. (2015) find no effects of financial incentives to work in the United States and Switzerland. However, Campolieti and Riddell (2012); Kostol and Mogstad (2014); and Ruh and Staubli (2016) find positive responses in Canada, Norway, and Austria. Zaresani (2017) suggests that the relative size of the incentives to work induced by a program versus the adjustment costs that individuals face when changingtheir labor supply could possibly explain these disparate findings.
机译:残疾保险(DI)计划是发达国家最大的社会援助计划之一。这些计划为患有健康状况的个人提供了好处,这些健康状况限制了他们可以执行的有偿工作的数量或类型。人们一直对直接投资计划的高支出水平感到担忧。直接投资计划还因诱使受益人减少劳动力供应而受到批评。因此,大多数国家已经实施或正在考虑实施政策,以使受益人“重返工作岗位”。这些计划允许直接投资受益人在工作时收集全部或部分收益。尽管重返工作政策旨在增加直接投资计划中的劳动力供应,但有关此类政策有效性的实证证据参差不齐。例如,Hoynes和Moffitt(1999); Benitez-Silva,Buchinsky和Rust(2011); Weathers and Hemmeter(2011);和巴特勒等。 (2015年)发现在美国和瑞士工作的经济激励措施没有影响。然而,Campolieti和Riddell(2012); Kostol和Mogstad(2014); Ruh和Staubli(2016)在加拿大,挪威和奥地利获得了积极回应。 Zaresani(2017)认为,由计划引起的工作激励的相对规模与个人在改变其劳动力供应时面临的调整成本的相对规模可能可以解释这些不同的发现。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The American economic review》 |2018年第mayaappa期|272-276|共5页
  • 作者

    Arezou Zaresani;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号