...
首页> 外文期刊>The American economic review >Short-Term Impacts of a Pay-it-Forward Livestock Transfer and Training Program in Nepal
【24h】

Short-Term Impacts of a Pay-it-Forward Livestock Transfer and Training Program in Nepal

机译:尼泊尔“有偿支付”牲畜转移和培训计划的短期影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study evaluates the short-term (1.5 year) impacts of a multifaceted livestock transfer and training program in rural Nepal using a randomized control trial (RCT). The program seeks to reduce poverty through group formation, livestock transfers (two doe goats), technical trainings, and values-based training. Values-based training encourages beneficiaries to "pay it forward" (PIF) by providing technical training and the first-born female offspring of their received goats to another individual in their community. We ask three questions: (i) what are the short-term impacts of the program? (ii) Are all program components necessary to achieve impact? (iii) Is the PIF mechanism effective at spreading impacts?Despite the popularity of livestock transfer and training programs as anti-poverty interventions, until recently there was little empirical evidence of their effectiveness. Banerjee et al. (2015) evaluate the impact of the BRAC Graduation program, an intensive asset transfer and training program, in six countries. After three years the BRAC program has positive impacts on expenditure, food security, assets, finance, time use, income, and mental health. Women's empowerment initiallyincreases, but the effect dissipates over time. Spillover effects are not detected. The BRAC program is distinct from the program evaluated here in several important ways. First, the size of the transfer is two to four times larger. Second, beneficiaries received regular food or cash transfers for up to a year. Third, beneficiaries were not expected to transfer program benefits on to others.
机译:这项研究使用随机对照试验(RCT)评估了尼泊尔农村地区多层面牲畜转移和培训计划的短期(1.5年)影响。该计划旨在通过组团,牲畜转移(两只母鹿山羊),技术培训和基于价值的培训来减少贫困。基于价值的培训鼓励受益者通过向其社区中的另一个人提供技术培训和所接收山羊的第一胎雌性后代来“偿还款项”。我们提出三个问题:(i)该计划的短期影响是什么? (ii)是否需要所有方案组成部分才能产生影响? (iii)PIF机制是否有效地传播影响?尽管畜牧业转让和培训计划作为反贫困干预措施而广受欢迎,但直到最近,几乎没有任何实证证据表明其有效性。 Banerjee等。 (2015年)评估了BRAC毕业计划(一项密集的资产转移和培训计划)在六个国家/地区的影响。三年后,BRAC计划对支出,粮食安全,资产,财务,时间使用,收入和心理健康产生了积极影响。妇女的权能最初增加,但随着时间的流逝,这种影响逐渐消失。未检测到溢出效应。 BRAC程序在几个重要方面不同于此处评估的程序。首先,转移的大小是原来的2到4倍。其次,受益人获得了长达一年的定期食品或现金转移。第三,不希望受益人将计划的利益转移给其他人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号