首页> 外文期刊>American economic journal >Financial Liberalization, Debt Mismatch, Allocative Efficiency, and Growth
【24h】

Financial Liberalization, Debt Mismatch, Allocative Efficiency, and Growth

机译:金融自由化,债务错配,分配效率和增长

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Financial liberalization increases growth, but leads to more crises and costly bailouts. We present a two-sector model in which liberalization, by allowing debt-denomination mismatch, relaxes borrowing limits in the financially constrained sector, but endogenously generates crisis risk. When regulation restricts external financing to standard debt, liberalization preserves financial discipline and may increase allocative efficiency, growth, and consumption possibilities. By contrast, under unfettered liberalization that also allows uncollateralized option-like liabilities, discipline breaks down, and efficiency falls. The model yields a testable gains-from-liberalization condition, which holds in emerging markets. It also helps rationalize the contrasting experience of emerging markets and the recent US housing crisis.
机译:金融自由化促进了增长,但导致了更多的危机和昂贵的救助计划。我们提出了一种两个部门的模型,在这种模型中,自由化通过允许债务面额的不匹配,放宽了财务受限部门的借款限额,但内生地产生了危机风险。当法规将外部融资限制为标准债务时,自由化将保留金融纪律,并可能增加分配效率,增长和消费的可能性。相比之下,在自由放任的自由化下也允许无抵押的类期权债务,纪律破裂,效率下降。该模型产生了可测试的自由化收益条件,该条件在新兴市场中有效。它还有助于合理化新兴市场和近期美国住房危机的对比经验。

著录项

  • 来源
    《American economic journal》 |2016年第2期|1-44|共44页
  • 作者

    Romain Ranciere; Aaron Tornell;

  • 作者单位

    Paris School of Economic, 48 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris;

    University of California Los Angeles, 8283 Bunche Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号