...
首页> 外文期刊>American Chemical Society, Division of Fuel Chemistry, Preprints >ALGAE BIOFUEL PRODUCTION STRATEGIES: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED FROM LCA AND TEA AND WHAT DOES IT MEAN?
【24h】

ALGAE BIOFUEL PRODUCTION STRATEGIES: WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED FROM LCA AND TEA AND WHAT DOES IT MEAN?

机译:藻类生物燃料生产策略:我们从LCA和茶中学到了什么,这意味着什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economicrnassessment (TEA) have been widely applied to the evaluation ofrnhypothetical algae-based biofuel production systems, even thoughrnvery few of these facilities have been constructed and operated as yet.rnThis is both valuable and challenging; since a priori assessmentrnallows for avoidance of sustainability pitfalls but also makes itrndifficult to collect accurate data on process inputs and outputs. Thernexisting LCA literature documents an evolution of expectationsrnrelated to algae biofuels platforms, whereby there has been increasingrnemphasis on making cultivation and conversion operations as simplernas possible. Procurement of low-“cost” or recycled nutrients (mostrnnotably nitrogen and carbon dioxide) is also especially critical, andrnthere is great interest in leveraging existing refining and distributionrninfrastructure. In this vein, the LCA and TEA literature reveal somernconvergence of views on what the most energy-efficient platform forrnalgae biofuels production could be: cultivation in outdoor racewayrnponds, followed by minimal bulk dewatering and conversion into biocrudernvia hydrothermal liquefaction, with internal recycling of thernaqueous co-product to recapture nutrients and valorization of gas andrnsolid-phases to improve the overall energy balance. This approachrnyields energy return on investment (EROI) and greenhouse gasrn(GHG) emissions metrics most closely aligned with desiredrnperformance targets. Perhaps not unsurprisingly, this approach is alsornquite similar to what is currently in operation by the presumed frontrunnerrnamong commercial algae-biofuels producers.rnLCA and TEA have also yielded unexpected conclusions arisingrnfrom sensitivity analyses; whereby it has been possible to assess whatrnindividual inputs or process conditions most strongly impact thernoverall environmental or economic bottom line of a hypothetical fuelproducingrnsystem. This information is valuable for guiding ongoingrnand future experimental work, so that the overall process can bernimproved and optimized. The ultimate goal is production of algaederivedrndistillates (gasoline and diesel) that are certifiable under thernUS’ existing biofuels framework, the Renewable Fuels Standardrn(“RSF2”). Preliminary evidence suggests that this is most likelyrnachievable for the algae HTL pathway noted above.
机译:生命周期评估(LCA)和技术经济评估(TEA)已被广泛应用于基于假想藻类的生物燃料生产系统的评估,尽管这些设施的建设和运营还很少。因为先验评估避免了避免可持续性陷阱,但也使得收集过程输入和输出的准确数据变得困难。现有的LCA文献记录了与藻类生物燃料平台有关的期望的发展,由此越来越强调使栽培和转化操作变得更简单。采购廉价的“成本”或循环利用的营养素(最主要是氮和二氧化碳)也尤为重要,并且人们对利用现有的精炼和分销基础设施非常感兴趣。在这种情况下,LCA和TEA文献揭示了关于最节能平台的纳尔加生物燃料生产的观点的某些观点的融合:在室外水道中种植,然后进行最小的批量脱水和通过水热液化转化为生物藻类,并通过内部热水循环利用-产品可回收养分并固定气相和固相,以改善整体能量平衡。这种方法产生的投资回报率(EROI)和温室气体(GHG)排放指标与期望的绩效目标最接近。也许并不奇怪,这种方法也与假定的领先的商业藻类生物燃料生产商目前正在使用的方法类似。LCA和TEA还从敏感性分析中得出了出乎意料的结论。从而有可能评估最可能影响假设燃料生产系统的总体环境或经济底线的各种输入或过程条件。这些信息对于指导正在进行的和将来的实验工作非常有价值,因此可以改进和优化整个过程。最终目标是生产藻类馏分油(汽油和柴油),并根据美国现有的生物燃料框架可再生燃料标准(“ RSF2”)进行认证。初步证据表明,这对于上述藻类HTL途径最有可能实现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号