首页> 外文期刊>Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation >ARBITRATION CLAUSE IN WEBSITE'S 'BROWSEWRAP' TERMS NOT ENFORCEABLE AGAINST CONSUMER
【24h】

ARBITRATION CLAUSE IN WEBSITE'S 'BROWSEWRAP' TERMS NOT ENFORCEABLE AGAINST CONSUMER

机译:网站的“浏览权”条款中的仲裁条款对消费者不利

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Inc. (9th Cir. August 18, 2014) (1.usa.gov/1kP5ECD) -According to the Ninth Circuit, "where a Web site makes its terms of use available via a conspicuous hyperlink on every page of the Web site but otherwise provides no notice to users nor prompts them to take any affirmative action to demonstrate assent, even close proximity of the hyperlink to relevant buttons users must click on-without more-is insufficient to give rise to constructive notice." While courts have upheld the terms of browsewrap agreements, particularly in the business-to-business context, this decision indicates the advisability of including an arbitration provision on an e-commerce site in a "clickwrap" agreement requiring consumers to affirm consent, usually by clicking a button or in a box.
机译:Nguyen诉Barnes&Noble Inc.(9th Cir。2014年8月18日)(1.usa.gov/1kP5ECD)-根据第九巡回法庭的规定,“在每个网站上,网站都通过明显的超链接提供其使用条款网站的页面,但不向用户提供任何通知,也不提示用户采取任何肯定的行动表示同意,即使超链接非常接近用户必须单击的相关按钮,也不能单击,这不足以引起建设性的通知。 ”尽管法院维护了“浏览包装协议”的条款,尤其是在企业对企业的情况下,但该判决表明,建议在电子商务网站中将一项仲裁条款纳入“点击包装”协议中,以要求消费者确认同意,通常是通过单击按钮或在框中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号