...
首页> 外文期刊>Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation >Automatic Court-Annexed Mediation in New York's Federal District Courts: Sometimes Numbers Don't Lie
【24h】

Automatic Court-Annexed Mediation in New York's Federal District Courts: Sometimes Numbers Don't Lie

机译:在纽约联邦区法院的自动庭院姓氏调解:有时数字不撒谎

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

On the surface, it might seem that a court automatically sending cases to mediation is an oxymoron. Self-determination-including determining whether to mediate-is often thought of as an essential aspect of the mediation process. It turns out, however, that at least for the mediation programs operated by New York's federal district courts, automatically sending cases to mediation-or, in one revealing instance, arbitration-is quite successful in resolving large numbers of cases with little judicial input or oversight. This article will provide an overview of the data relating to court-annexed mediation programs in those courts. It is updated from a 2017 presentation at the New York State Bar Association's Annual Meeting before the association's Dispute Resolution Section, and is revised from a version that appeared in the Spring 2018 New York Dispute Resolution Lawyer, which is published by the N.Y. State Bar Association (available for members at http:// bit.ly/2VHZs3c). This update provides recent data, and further confirms the conclusions put forth in the earlier version.
机译:在表面上,似乎法院自动向调解发送案件是矛盾的。自我确定 - 包括确定是否调解 - 通常被认为是作为调解过程的重要方面。然而,事实证明,至少对于纽约联邦地区法院运营的调解计​​划,自动将案件发送到调解 - 或者在一个揭示实例中,仲裁 - 在解决大量司法投入或司法投入的情况下非常成功监督。本文将概述与该法院的法庭附属调解方案有关的数据。它于2017年在协会争议解决方案之前在纽约州律师协会年度会议上进行了更新,并从2018年春季争端解决律师举报的版本中修订,该届纽约争议决议律师由纽约州律师协会发表(可用于http:// bit.ly/2vhzs3c的成员。此更新提供了最近的数据,并进一步确认了早期版本中提出的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号