首页> 外文期刊>Aircraft maintenance technology >Supreme Court Case: May open FAA certificate actions for review
【24h】

Supreme Court Case: May open FAA certificate actions for review

机译:最高法院案件:可能会开启FAA证书诉讼进行审查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Jones vs. Flowers USSC 4-26-06, No. 04-1477 FAA enforcement notice requirements: The FAA will default an airman or a certificated company for failing to answer a notice from them relating to their operating certificate. Typically, after getting no response to the notice they will bring a motion before the NTSB to have a proposed sanction imposed by default. These cases result in the airman or other certificated person filing a motion to set aside the sanction and allowing them to argue their case on its merits. Various excuses for failing to answer include a lack of notice of the proceeding. This excuse is routinely denied and sanctions imposed.
机译:Jones vs. Flowers USSC 4-26-06,第04-1477号FAA强制执行通知要求:FAA将因未能回答他们有关其操作证书的通知而拖欠一名飞行员或经认证的公司。通常,在未收到通知的情况下,他们将向NTSB提出动议,要求其默认实施建议的制裁措施。这些案件导致飞行员或其他持证人提出撤消制裁的动议,并允许他们就案情进行辩论。未能回答的各种借口包括没有注意到诉讼程序。该借口通常被拒绝,并施加制裁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号