首页> 外文期刊>Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology >Flight flutter testing and aeroelastic stability of aircraft
【24h】

Flight flutter testing and aeroelastic stability of aircraft

机译:飞机的飞行颤振测试和气动弹性稳定性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - This paper sets out to provide a general review of the flight flutter test techniques utilized in aeroelastic stability flight testing of aircraft, and to highlight the key items involved in flight flutter testing of aircraft, by emphasizing all the main information processed during the flutter stability verification based on flight test data.rnDesign/methodology/approach - Flight flutter test requirements are first reviewed by referencing the relevant civil and military specifications. Excitation systems utilized in flight flutter testing are overviewed by stating the relative advantages and disadvantages of each technique. Flight test procedures followed in a typical flutter flight testing are described for different air speed regimes. Modal estimation methods, both in frequency and time domain, used in flutter prediction are surveyed. Most common flight flutter prediction methods are reviewed. Finally, key considerations for successful flight flutter testing are noted by referencing the related literature.rnFindings - Online, real time monitoring of flutter stability during flight testing is very crucial, if the flutter character is not known a priori. Techniques such as modal filtering can be used to uncouple response measurements to produce simplified single degree of freedom responses, which could then be analyzed with less-sophisticated algorithms that are more able to run in real time. Frequency domain subspace identification methods combined with time-frequency multiscale wavelet techniques are considered as the most promising modal estimation algorithms to be used in flight flutter testing. Practical implications - This study gives concise but relevant information on the flight flutter stability verification of aircraft to practising engineers. The three important steps used in flight flutter testing - structural excitation, structural response measurement, and stability prediction - are introduced by presenting different techniques for each of the three important steps. Emphasis has been given to the practical advantages and disadvantages of each technique. Originality/value - This paper offers a brief practical guide to all key items involved in flight flutter stability verification of aircraft.
机译:目的-本文着重介绍飞机气动弹性飞行测试中使用的飞行颤振测试技术,并通过强调在颤振过程中处理的所有主要信息来突出显示飞机飞行颤振测试中涉及的关键项目基于飞行测试数据的稳定性验证。设计/方法/方法-首先通过参考相关的民用和军事规格来审查飞行颤振测试要求。通过阐述每种技术的相对优势和劣势,对飞行颤振测试中使用的激励系统进行了概述。针对不同的风速范围,介绍了典型的颤振飞行测试中遵循的飞行测试程序。对颤振预测中使用的频域和时域模态估计方法进行了调查。回顾了最常见的飞行颤振预测方法。最后,通过参考相关文献,指出成功进行飞行颤振测试的关键考虑因素。rn发现-如果先验未知颤振特性,则在线,实时监视飞行测试过程中的颤振稳定性至关重要。诸如模态滤波之类的技术可用于解耦响应测量值,以产生简化的单自由度响应,然后可以使用更复杂,更实时的算法对其进行分析。频域子空间识别方法与时频多尺度小波技术相结合被认为是在飞行颤振测试中最有前途的模态估计算法。实际意义-这项研究向执业工程师提供了有关飞机飞行颤振稳定性验证的简洁但相关的信息。通过为三个重要步骤中的每一个提供不同的技术,介绍了飞行颤振测试中使用的三个重要步骤-结构激励,结构响应测量和稳定性预测。强调了每种技术的实际优缺点。原创性/价值-本文为飞机飞行颤振稳定性验证中涉及的所有关键项目提供了简要的实用指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号