首页> 外文期刊>AIDS and Behavior >Estimating Design Effect and Calculating Sample Size for Respondent-Driven Sampling Studies of Injection Drug Users in the United States
【24h】

Estimating Design Effect and Calculating Sample Size for Respondent-Driven Sampling Studies of Injection Drug Users in the United States

机译:在美国注射毒品使用者的响应驱动抽样研究中估算设计效果并计算样本量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) has become increasingly popular for sampling hidden populations, including injecting drug users (IDU). However, RDS data are unique and require specialized analysis techniques, many of which remain underdeveloped. RDS sample size estimation requires knowing design effect (DE), which can only be calculated post hoc. Few studies have analyzed RDS DE using real world empirical data. We analyze estimated DE from 43 samples of IDU collected using a standardized protocol. We find the previous recommendation that sample size be at least doubled, consistent with DE = 2, underestimates true DE and recommend researchers use DE = 4 as an alternate estimate when calculating sample size. A formula for calculating sample size for RDS studies among IDU is presented. Researchers faced with limited resources may wish to accept slightly higher standard errors to keep sample size requirements low. Our results highlight dangers of ignoring sampling design in analysis.
机译:响应者驱动的抽样(RDS)在抽样包括注射毒品使用者(IDU)在内的隐藏人群中已变得越来越流行。但是,RDS数据是唯一的,并且需要专门的分析技术,其中许多技术仍不完善。 RDS样本大小估计需要了解设计效果(DE),该效果只能事后计算。很少有研究使用现实世界的经验数据来分析RDS DE。我们分析使用标准化协议从IDU收集的43个样本中估算出的DE。我们发现先前的建议是将样本大小至少增加一倍,与DE = 2一致,低估了真实的DE,并建议研究人员在计算样本大小时使用DE = 4作为替代估计。提出了计算IDU中RDS研究样本量的公式。面临有限资源的研究人员不妨接受稍高的标准误差,以保持较低的样本量要求。我们的结果突出了在分析中忽略采样设计的危险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号