首页> 外文期刊>AIAA Journal >Large-Eddy Simulation of Separation Control for Flow over a Wall-Mounted Hump
【24h】

Large-Eddy Simulation of Separation Control for Flow over a Wall-Mounted Hump

机译:壁挂式驼峰流分离控制的大涡模拟

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This work describes an implicit large-eddy simulation for active control of flow over a wall-mounted hump. Results are presented for the baseline simulation without flow control and for both steady-suction and oscillatory blowing-and-suction flow control. Results are compared with Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes solutions and experimental data from NASA's 2004 Computational Fluid Dynamics Validation on Synthetic Jets and Turbulent Separation Control Workshop. The baseline and steady-suction cases achieved significantly better agreement with experimental flowfield characteristics than the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations in the separated region downstream of the hump. Because the large-eddy simulation was accomplished at one-fifth of the experimental Reynolds number, the oscillatory flow control displayed less effectiveness than the experiment. Using a larger oscillatory amplitude exerts more control on the separation bubble. Comparing the baseline flow solution with cases using flow control clearly demonstrates the ability to reduce the size of the separated flow region in the wake of the hump.
机译:这项工作描述了一个隐式大涡模拟,用于主动控制壁挂式驼峰上的流量。给出了不进行流量控制的基线模拟结果,以及稳态吸气和振荡吹吸式流量控制的结果。将结果与雷诺平均的Navier-Stokes解决方案进行比较,并将实验结果来自NASA 2004年在合成射流和湍流分离控制车间进行的计算流体动力学验证。与驼峰下游分离区域的雷诺平均Navier-Stokes模拟相比,基线和稳定吸力情况与实验流场特性的一致性更好。由于大涡流模拟是在实验雷诺数的五分之一的条件下完成的,因此振荡流控制显示出比实验低的有效性。使用较大的振荡幅度可对分离气泡进行更多控制。将基线流解与使用流控制的案例进行比较清楚地表明了在驼峰之后减小分离流区域大小的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号