...
首页> 外文期刊>AI & society >Behavioural artificial intelligence: an agenda for systematic empirical studies of artificial inference
【24h】

Behavioural artificial intelligence: an agenda for systematic empirical studies of artificial inference

机译:行为人工智能:人工推理系统实证研究的议程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Artificial intelligence (AI) receives attention in media as well as in academe and business. In media coverage and reporting, AI is predominantly described in contrasted terms, either as the ultimate solution to all human problems or the ultimate threat to all human existence. In academe, the focus of computer scientists is on developing systems that function, whereas philosophy scholars theorize about the implications of this functionality for human life. In the interface between technology and philosophy there is, however, one imperative aspect of AI yet to be articulated: how do intelligent systems make inferences? We use the overarching concept "Artificial Intelligent Behaviour" which would include both cognition/processing and judgment/behaviour. We argue that due to the complexity and opacity of artificial inference, one needs to initiate systematic empirical studies of artificial intelligent behavior similar to what has previously been done to study human cognition, judgment and decision making. This will provide valid knowledge, outside of what current computer science methods can offer, about the judgments and decisions made by intelligent systems. Moreover, outside academe-in the public as well as the private sector-expertise in epistemology, critical thinking and reasoning are crucial to ensure human oversight of the artificial intelligent judgments and decisions that are made, because only competent human insight into Al-inference processes will ensure accountability. Such insights require systematic studies of Al-behaviour founded on the natural sciences and philosophy, as well as the employment of methodologies from the cognitive and behavioral sciences.
机译:人工智能(AI)在媒体以及学术界和商业中获得注意。在媒体覆盖和报告中,AI主要以对比的术语描述,无论是对所有人类问题的最终解决方案还是对所有人类存在的最终威胁。在学术界,计算机科学家的重点是在开发功能的开发系统,而哲学学者理解这种功能对人类生活的影响。然而,在技术和哲学之间的界面中,AI的一个势在必行方面还没有明确:智能系统如何制定推论?我们使用总体概念“人工智能行为”,其包括认知/处理和判断/行为。我们争辩说,由于人工推断的复杂性和不透明度,人们需要启动对人工智能行为的系统性实证研究,类似于先前学习人类认知,判断和决策。这将提供有效的知识,外面的计算机科学方法可以提供关于智能系统所做的判断和决定。此外,在公众外部和私人部门 - 认识论中的专业知识,批判性思维和推理是至关重要的,这对于确保人为智能判断和所做的决定是至关重要的,因为只有能力的人力洞察到AL推论过程将确保问责制。这种见解需要对基于自然科学和哲学的AL行为的系统研究,以及从认知和行为科学的方法中的就业。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号