...
首页> 外文期刊>Agroforestry Systems >Water infiltration influenced by agroforestry and grass buffers for a grazed pasture system
【24h】

Water infiltration influenced by agroforestry and grass buffers for a grazed pasture system

机译:农牧业和草场缓冲带对牧草系统的水分渗透

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Agroforestry (AgB) and grass buffers (GB) are often adopted as alternative resource management tools in agroecosystems for environmental and economic benefits. The objective of this study was to compare the influence of AgB and GB systems under rotationally stocked (RP) and continuously stocked (CP) pasture systems on water infiltration measured using ponded infiltration and tension infiltration methods. Buffers were surrounded by a fence that prevented cattle from grazing within these areas. Soils at the site are Menfro silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, superactive, mesic Typic Hapludalf). Infiltration rates were measured using ponded ring infiltration units during 2 years for the four (AgB, GB, RP and CP) treatments with three replicates from two subareas within each treatment. Infiltration rate as a function of tension (at 50, 100, and 150 mm) was also measured using a tension infiltrometer. Water infiltration parameters were estimated using Green-Ampt and Parlange infiltration equations. Quasi-steady state infiltration rates (q s ) and field-saturated hydraulic conductivity (K fs ) for buffers were about 31 and 46 times higher as compared to pasture treatments, respectively. Green-Ampt and Parlange models appeared to fit measured data with r 2 values ranging from 0.91 to 0.98. The q s (measured with ponded method) in the first year for the GB treatment was the highest (221 mm h−1) and for the CP treatment was the lowest (3.7 mm h−1). For both years, estimated sorptivity (S) and saturated hydraulic conductivity (K s ) parameters were higher for buffer areas compared to the stocked pasture areas. Grazing reduced the infiltration rate for the pasture (RP and CP) treatments. Results show that the buffer areas have higher infiltration rates which imply lower runoff compared to pasture areas.
机译:农林(AgB)和草缓冲(GB)通常被用作农业生态系统中的替代资源管理工具,以实现环境和经济利益。这项研究的目的是比较旋转池(RP)和连续池(CP)牧草系统下的AgB和GB系统对使用池塘入渗和张力入渗法测量的水入渗的影响。缓冲区被围栏包围,该围栏防止牛在这些区域内放牧。该地点的土壤为Menfro粉砂壤土(细粉质,混合,超活性,中性Typic Hapludalf)。在4年(AgB,GB,RP和CP)处理中,使用池环式渗透装置测量了2年内的渗透率,每个处理中有两个分区重复了3次。还使用张力渗透计测量渗透率与张力的关系(在50、100和150 mm时)。使用Green-Ampt和Parlange渗透方程估算水的渗透参数。与牧场处理相比,缓冲液的准稳态渗透率(q s )和场饱和水力传导率(K fs )分别高约31和46倍。 Green-Ampt和Parlange模型似乎适合测量数据,r 2 值在0.91至0.98之间。 GB治疗第一年的q s (用积水法测量)最高(221 mm h -1 ),而CP治疗最低( 3.7毫米h -1 )。与牧草区相比,这两年缓冲区的估计吸水率(S)和饱和水导率(K s )参数都较高。放牧降低了牧场(RP和CP)处理的渗透率。结果表明,与牧场相比,缓冲区具有较高的入渗率,这意味着较低的径流。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号