首页> 外文期刊>Agroforestry Systems >Species richness increases income in agroforestry systems of eastern Amazonia
【24h】

Species richness increases income in agroforestry systems of eastern Amazonia

机译:物种丰富度增加了东亚马逊地区农林业系统的收入

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Biodiversity is believed to reduce risks (resistance and resilience against perturbations), to increase productivity via niche expansion, and possibly also to improve resource efficiency via mutually benefic species interactions. Agroforestry has been postulated as an ideal pathway of maintaining or restoring biodiversity in a socioeconomically sustainable manner. This study tests the relevance of agroforestry species diversity and richness on socioeconomic performance in a wide range of agroforestry systems in 38 farms aggregated in four clusters of sites in eastern Amazonia. We cover both commercial and subsistence agroforestry, ranging from simply structured plantations to diverse systems (enriched fallows, multi-strata home gardens), as well as pastures and shifting cultivation for comparisons. We quantify (i) all cultivated species, classifying them economically into species with commercial value, primarily subsistence purpose species or ‘non-productive’ species, and (ii) socioeconomic system variables (costs, monetaryon-monetary income, degree of satisfaction). Land-use intensity (per-hectare costs and income) was highest in commercial agroforestry and subsistence home gardens, and lowest in enriched fallows and pastures. All agroforestry systems resulted in higher income:cost ratios and greater satisfaction than pastures and shifting cultivation. Net income, non-monetary income and income:cost ratio were maximum in home gardens. Total species richness was negatively related with costs and monetary income, but not with non-monetary income, due to occupation of space by ‘non-productive’ species (juveniles or species providing ecosystem services). By contrast, productive (combining commercial and subsistence) species richness was positively related with (mainly non-monetary) income, net income and income:cost ratio. According to GLM, both productive species richness and Shannon–Wiener diversity positively affected net income. Future efforts for food security and poverty reduction need to focus more on species-rich agroforestry systems, both in terms of applied research and of extension service programs. Notably, the ubiquitous and successful home gardens merit far more attention.
机译:人们相信生物多样性可以减少风险(抵抗干扰的能力和抵御能力),通过利基扩张来提高生产力,还可能通过互惠互利的物种相互作用来提高资源利用效率。假定农林业是一种以社会经济上可持续的方式维持或恢复生物多样性的理想途径。这项研究测试了亚马逊东部地区四个地点的38个农场中,农林综合物种多样性和丰富度对多种农林系统中社会经济绩效的相关性。我们涵盖商业和自给自足的农用林业,从结构简单的人工林到多样化的系统(丰富的休耕地,多层住宅花园),以及牧场和轮作种植供比较。我们量化(i)所有栽培物种,将其经济地分类为具有商业价值的物种,主要是生存目的物种或“非生产性”物种,以及(ii)社会经济系统变量(成本,货币/非货币收入,满意度) )。商业农用林业和自给家庭园地的土地利用强度(每公顷成本和收入)最高,而丰富的休耕地和牧场的土地利用强度最低。与牧场和轮换种植相比,所有农林业系统都带来了更高的收入:成本比和更高的满意度。家庭花园的净收入,非货币收入和收入成本比最大。由于“非生产性”物种(幼体或提供生态系统服务的物种)对空间的占用,物种总丰富度与成本和货币收入呈负相关,但与非货币收入却不呈负相关。相比之下,生产性(商业性和生计性)物种丰富度与(主要是非货币性)收入,净收入和收入成本比成正比。根据GLM,生产物种的丰富度和Shannon-Wiener多样性都对净收入产生了积极影响。在应用研究和推广服务计划方面,未来为粮食安全和减贫所作的努力应更多地集中在物种丰富的农林业系统上。值得注意的是,无处不在且成功的家庭花园值得更多关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号