首页> 外文期刊>Age and Ageing >Inhaler Technique of Elderly Patients: Comparison of Metered-dose Inhalers and Large Volume Spacer Devices
【24h】

Inhaler Technique of Elderly Patients: Comparison of Metered-dose Inhalers and Large Volume Spacer Devices

机译:老年患者的吸入器技术:定量吸入器和大容量间隔器的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Large volume spacers (LVSs) reduce systemic absorption of steroid from metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) but there are no data to support the widespread belief that LVSs are easy for older people to use. MDI and LVS technique was examined in 40 inhaler-naive patients [19 men; 70-92 (mean 78.3) years] with chronic airways disease and mental test scores > 7/10. On day 1, technique was taught and errors corrected if possible. Technique was scored and patients asked which device they preferred. They were prescribed the device with which they were most competent. Those competent with both were given a device randomly. Technique was reassessed on day 29 without further tuition. On day 1 only three patients (8%) had inadequate technique for LVS vs. 12 (30%) for MDI (χ~2 = 6.90; p = 0.032). The main problems were inability to trigger the device (two patients with both devices), problems co-ordinating triggering and inhalation (20 patients with MDI), problems inserting the MDI into the LVS (seven patients), and unnecessary repetitive firing of the LVS (three patients); 28 (70%) preferred LVSs. On day 29, 29/30 (97%) with LVSs used them adequately, as did 13/15 (87%) using MDIs (five patients used both). LVSs have advantages over MDIs for elderly patients in terms of patient preference and inhaler technique.
机译:大容量垫片(LVS)减少了计量吸入器(MDI)对类固醇的全身吸收,但没有数据支持普遍认为LVS易于老年人使用。在40例未使用吸入器的患者中检查了MDI和LVS技术[19名男性; 70-92岁(平均78.3岁),患有慢性气道疾病且智力测验得分> 7/10。在第1天,教授了技术,并在可能的情况下纠正了错误。对技术进行评分,患者询问他们首选哪种设备。他们被规定了他们最能胜任的设备。那些都胜任的人会随机获得一个设备。在第29天重新评估了技术,而没有进一步的学费。在第1天,只有三名患者(8%)的LVS技术不完善,而MDI的技术只有12名(30%)(χ〜2 = 6.90; p = 0.032)。主要问题是无法触发设备(两名患者同时使用两个设备),协调触发和吸入问题(20名MDI患者),将MDI插入LVS的问题(七名患者)以及不必要的LVS重复触发(三名患者); 28(70%)个首选LVS。在第29天,使用LVS的29/30(97%)适当地使用了它们,使用MDI的13/15(87%)也是如此(五个病人都使用了)。就患者偏好和吸入技术而言,LVS在老年患者方面比MDI具有优势。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Age and Ageing》 |1995年第3期|p.190-192|共3页
  • 作者

    M. J. CONNOLLY;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Geriatric Medicine University of Manchester, Barnes Hospital, Cheadle, Cheshire SK8 2NY;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 全身性疾病;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:20:57

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号