【24h】

Signal models for TDOA/FDOA estimation

机译:TDOA / FDOA估计的信号模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Much research has been done in the area of estimating time-difference-of-arrival (TDOA) and frequency-difference-of-arrival (FDOA) and their use in locating a radiating source. Early work in this area was focused on locating acoustic sources using passive sonar processing. Only later was TDOA/FDOA-based location considered for the case of passively locating electromagnetic sources. As a result of this, it is tempting to use results derived for the acoustic case when answering questions about the electromagnetic case. This correspondence shows that such borrowing can lead to incorrect results. The key factor that drives the significant differences between these two cases is the difference between the signal model assumptions for the two cases: wide-sense stationary (WSS) Gaussian process in the acoustic case and a deterministic signal in the electromagnetic case. Although the received signal equations may look identical (showing delay and Doppler shift), the resulting Fisher information, Cramer-Rao bound (CRB), and maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) are fundamentally different for the two signal scenarios.
机译:在估计到达时间差(TDOA)和到达频率差(FDOA)及其在定位辐射源中的用途方面已经进行了很多研究。该领域的早期工作集中于使用被动声纳处理来定位声源。对于被动定位电磁源,直到后来才考虑基于TDOA / FDOA的定位。结果,当回答关于电磁情况的问题时,倾向于使用针对声学情况得出的结果。这种对应关系表明,这种借用可能导致错误的结果。导致这两种情况之间存在显着差异的关键因素是两种情况下信号模型假设之间的差异:声学情况下的宽广平稳(WSS)高斯过程和电磁情况下的确定性信号。尽管接收到的信号方程可能看起来相同(显示延迟和多普勒频移),但是对于这两种信号方案,所得的Fisher信息,Cramer-Rao界(CRB)和最大似然估计器(MLE)根本不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号