首页> 外文期刊>Aerobiologia >Analysis of airborne pollen time series originating from Hirst-type volumetric samplers-comparison between mobile sampling head oriented toward wind direction and fixed sampling head with two-layered inlet
【24h】

Analysis of airborne pollen time series originating from Hirst-type volumetric samplers-comparison between mobile sampling head oriented toward wind direction and fixed sampling head with two-layered inlet

机译:始发催手型体积采样器的空气载花粉时间序列 - 移动采样朝向风向的移动采样头与固定采样头的两层入口的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this study, we have compared time series of pollen concentration originating from two Hirst-type volumetric samplers that were equipped with different sampling heads. To collect airborne pollen, we have used classic sampler with mobile sampling head including wind vane and adapted sampler with fixed sampling head having two-layered inlet, like in Sigma-2 passive sampler. The devices were placed at the roof level, on the top of the building of the Faculty of Sciences located in Novi Sad, Serbia. The sampling of airborne pollen was performed from February until October 2019. Along with the pollen data, meteorological conditions were recorded with an automated weather station measuring solar radiation, air temperature, relative humidity, wind speed and precipitation. Time series of daily pollen concentrations expressed high correlations, although there were large differences on the hourly basis. Absolute difference between hourly values showed very weak correlation with relevant meteorological parameters: temperature, humidity, precipitation, wind speed and turbulent kinetic energy, leading to the conclusion that sampling with both heads was not affected by meteorological conditions. Counting the pollen grains from the whole sample and not just from 10% of the area, which is the minimum requirement, was done for the six days in the season and proved that error introduced by subsampling during analysis was the main reason for differences in time series. To conclude, replacing mobile sampling head with fixed sampling head having two-layered inlet does not notably affect the quantity of pollen recorded by the Hirst-type volumetric method.
机译:在这项研究中,我们已经比较了源自两种催手型体积采样器的花粉浓度,这些花粉浓度均配有不同的采样头。要收集空气载花粉,我们使用了具有移动采样头的经典采样器,包括风向标和具有固定采样头的调整采样器,其具有两个层状入口,如Sigma-2被动采样器。这些设备放置在屋顶水平,位于塞尔维亚诺维萨斯州的科学教师的顶部。空气载花粉的采样从2月至2019年10月进行。随着花粉数据,用自动化气象站测量太阳辐射,空气温度,相对湿度,风速和沉淀,记录气象条件。日常花粉浓度的时间序列表达了高相关性,尽管每小时差异很大。小时值之间的绝对差异显示出与相关气象参数的相关性非常弱:温度,湿度,降水,风速和湍流动能,导致与两个头的抽样不受气象条件的影响。从整个样本中计算花粉谷物,而不仅仅是该赛季最低要求的地区的10%,并证明了在分析期间通过分配引入的错误是时间差异的主要原因系列。为了得出结论,用固定的采样头替换具有两个层状入口的固定采样头的移动采样头不会显着影响由HIRST型体积方法记录的花粉的量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号