首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Water Resources >Flood propagation modeling with the Local Inertia Approximation: Theoretical and numerical analysis of its physical limitations
【24h】

Flood propagation modeling with the Local Inertia Approximation: Theoretical and numerical analysis of its physical limitations

机译:具有局部惯性近似的洪水传播模型:其物理局限性的理论和数值分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Attention of the researchers has increased towards a simplification of the complete Shallow water Equations called the Local Inertia Approximation (LInA), which is obtained by neglecting the advection term in the momentum conservation equation. This model, whose physical basis is discussed here, is commonly used for the simulation of slow flooding phenomena characterized by small velocities and absence of flow discontinuities. In the present paper it is demonstrated that a shock is always developed at moving wetting-drying frontiers, and this justifies the study of the Riemann problem on even and uneven beds. In particular, the general exact solution for the Riemann problem on horizontal frictionless bed is given, together with the exact solution of the non-breaking wave propagating on horizontal bed with friction, while some example solution is given for the Riemann problem on discontinuous bed. From this analysis, it follows that drying of the wet bed is forbidden in the LInA model, and that there are initial conditions for which the Riemann problem has no solution on smoothly varying bed. In addition, propagation of the flood on discontinuous sloping bed is impossible if the bed drops height has the same order of magnitude of the moving-frontier shock height. Finally, it is found that the conservation of the mechanical energy is violated. It is evident that all these findings pose a severe limit to the application of the model. The numerical analysis has confirmed the existence of the frontal shock in advancing flows, but has also demonstrated that LInA numerical models may produce numerical solutions, which are unreliable because of mere algorithmic nature, also in the case that the LInA mathematical solutions do not exist.Following the preceding results, two criteria for the definition of the applicability limits of the LInA model have been considered. These criteria, which are valid for the very restrictive case of continuously varying bed elevation, are based on the limitation of the wetting front velocity and the limitation of spurious total head variations, respectively. Based on these criteria, the applicability limits of the LInA model are discouragingly severe, even if the bed elevation varies continuously. More important, the non-existence of the LInA solution in the case of discontinuous topography and the non-existence of receding fronts radically question the viability of the LInA model in realistic cases. It is evident that classic SWE models should be preferred in the majority of the practical applications.
机译:研究人员越来越重视简化称为局部惯性近似(LInA)的完整浅水方程,该方程是通过在动量守恒方程中忽略对流项而获得的。该模型的物理基础在此进行了讨论,通常用于模拟慢速泛滥现象,其特征是速度小且流量不连续。在本文中,证明了在移动干湿边界时总是会产生冲击,这证明了在平坦和不平坦的床上研究黎曼问题的合理性。特别是,给出了在水平无摩擦床上黎曼问题的一般精确解,以及在有摩擦的水平床上传播不间断波的精确解,同时给出了在不连续床上黎曼问题的一些示例解。根据该分析,可以得出结论,在LInA模型中禁止对湿床进行干燥,并且在某些初始条件下,黎曼问题无法在光滑变化的床上解决。此外,如果水床降落高度与移动边界冲击高度相同的数量级,则洪水不可能在不连续的倾斜水床上传播。最后,发现违反了机械能的守恒。显然,所有这些发现严重限制了模型的应用。数值分析已经证实了前进流动中存在正面冲击,但是也证明了LInA数值模型可能会产生数值解,由于仅是算法性质,因此在不存在LInA数学解的情况下也不可靠。根据前面的结果,已经考虑了两个用于定义LInA模型的适用范围的标准。这些标准分别适用于连续不断变化的床高高度的限制性条件,分别基于润湿锋速的限制和虚假总水头变化的限制。基于这些标准,即使床高连续变化,LInA模型的适用极限也令人沮丧。更重要的是,在地形不连续的情况下,不存在LInA解决方案,并且不存在后退前沿,从根本上质疑了LInA模型在实际情况下的可行性。显然,在大多数实际应用中应该首选经典SWE模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号