首页> 外文期刊>Advances in space research >Performance evaluation of the IRI 2016 and IRI-Plas 2017 models over central Asian mid-latitude regions in the descending phase of solar cycle 24
【24h】

Performance evaluation of the IRI 2016 and IRI-Plas 2017 models over central Asian mid-latitude regions in the descending phase of solar cycle 24

机译:2016年IRI和IRI-PLAS 2017模型在太阳循环的下降阶段中亚洲中纬度地区的IRI 2017模型绩效评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper scrutinizes the performance of the latest versions of the IRI model (IRI 2016 with NeQuick, IRI01-corr and IRI2001 options for the topside electron density) and the IRI extended to the plasmasphere (IRI-Plas 2017) models in the estimation of the Vertical TEC (VTEC) variation over the central Asian mid-latitude regions in the descending phase of solar cycle 24 (2014-2016). The GPS dual frequency receivers installed at Kurchatov, KRTV (geog 50.71 degrees N, 78.62 degrees E, Geom. 41.84 degrees N), Khantau, SUMK (44.21 degrees N, 74.00 degrees E, Geom. 35.73 degrees N), Talas, TALA (42.45 degrees N, 72.21 degrees E, Geom.34.13 degrees N) and Kazarman, KAZA (41.38 degrees N, 73.94 degrees E, Geom.32.92 degrees N) have been used to derive the estimate of the vertical TEC (GPS-VTEC) for the comparison of the monthly and seasonal performance of the models. The modelled VTEC values generally tend to be larger than the GPS-VTEC values during periods of high solar irradiance (daytime hours), with the highest overestimation being observed by IRI-Plas 2017 model followed by IRI 2016 model with the IRI2001 topside option. However, the differences between the models and between the models and the GPS-VTEC values become diminished as the solar irradiance decreases, with the highest underestimation being observed by the IRI 2016 model with NeQuick topside option. It has also been shown that the smallest root-mean-square deviations between the GPS-VTEC and modelled VTEC are observed generally in the June solstice months, showing that the models perform best during local summer. On the contrary, the largest root-mean-square deviations between the modelled VTEC and GPS-VTEC are observed during high solar irradiance on the surface of the Earth (especially in the time interval between 05:00 and 10:00 UT which corresponds to the daytime hours 10:00 and 15:00 LT), showing that the models perform poorly during high solar irradiance. In addition, both the IRI 2016 and IRI-Plas 2017 models show a progressive decline in VTEC during a negative storm, but do not adequately estimate the storm time VTEC variation. (C) 2019 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文审查了IRI模型的最新版本的性能(IRI 2016使用Nequick,IRI01-Cor和Topide电子密度的IRI2001选项)和IRI扩展到Plasmasphere(IRI-PLAS 2017)模型的估计垂直TEC(VTEC)在太阳循环24(2014-2016)的下降阶段中的中亚中纬度地区的变化(2014-2016)。安装在Kurchatov,KRTV的GPS双频接收器(GeoG 50.71,78.62摄氏度,Geom。41.84度N),Khantau,SUMK(44.21度N,74.00度,Geom。35.73度N),塔拉斯,塔拉( 42.45,72.21摄影,Geom.34.13度N)和Kazarman,卡扎(41.38度N,73.94 e,Geom.32.92度N)用于导出垂直TEC(GPS-VTEC)的估计模型每月和季节性表现的比较。所建模的VTEC值通常趋于大于高太阳辐照度(日间时间)的GPS-VTEC值,通过IRI-PLAS 2017模型观察到最高的高估,然后是IRI2001顶端选项。然而,模型与模型与GPS-VTEC值之间的差异变得在太阳辐照度下降时减少,因此IRL 2016模型与Nequick Topside选项中的IRI 2016模型观察到最高的低估。还表明,GPS-VTEC与模型VTEC之间的最小根平均方形偏差通常在6月溶剂月份中观察到,显示模型在当地夏季最佳。相反,在地球表面上的高太阳辐照度期间观察到建模VTEC和GPS-VTEC之间的最大根平均方偏差(特别是在05:00至10:00之间的时间间隔内对应于白天10:00和15:00 LT),显示模型在高太阳辐照度下执行差。此外,IRI 2016和IRI-PLAS 2017模型在负面风暴期间显示VTEC的逐步下降,但没有充分估计风暴时间VTEC变化。 (c)2019 Cospar。 elsevier有限公司出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号