...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in space research >Highlights about the performances of storm-time TEC modelling techniques for low/equatorial and mid-latitude locations
【24h】

Highlights about the performances of storm-time TEC modelling techniques for low/equatorial and mid-latitude locations

机译:有关低/赤道和中纬度地区风暴时间TEC建模技术的性能亮点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A statistical evaluation of storm-time total electron content (TEC) modelling techniques over various latitudes of the African sector and surrounding areas is presented. The source of observational TEC data used in this study is the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), specifically the Global Positioning Systems (GPS) receiver networks. For each selected receiver station, three different storm time models based on empirical orthogonal functions (EOF) analysis, non-linear regression analysis (NLRA) and Artificial neural networks (ANN), were implemented. Storm-time GPS TEC data used for both development and validation of the models was selected based on the storm criterion of Dst = -50 nT or K-p = 4 to take into account both coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and co-rotating interaction regions (CIRs) driven storms, respectively. To make an independent test of the models, storm periods considered for validation were excluded from datasets used during the implementation of the models and results are compared with observations, monthly median values, and International Reference Ionosphere (IRI-2016) predictions. Considering GPS TEC as reference, a statistical analysis performed over six storm periods reserved for validation revealed that ANN model is about 10%, 26%, and 58% more accurate than EOF, NLRA, and IRI models, respectively. It was further found that, EOF model performs 15%, and 44% better than NLRA, and IRI models, respectively, while NLRA is 25% better than IRI. On the other hand, results are also discussed referring to the background ionosphere represented by monthly median TEC (MM TEC) and statistics are provided. Moreover, strengths and weaknesses of each model are highlighted. (C) 2019 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:介绍了对非洲地区和周边地区不同纬度的风暴时间总电子含量(TEC)建模技术的统计评估。本研究中使用的观测TEC数据的来源是全球导航卫星系统(GNSS),特别是全球定位系统(GPS)接收器网络。对于每个选定的接收站,都基于经验正交函数(EOF)分析,非线性回归分析(NLRA)和人工神经网络(ANN)实施了三种不同的风暴时间模型。根据Dst <= -50 nT或Kp> = 4的风暴标准,选择了用于模型开发和验证的风暴时间GPS TEC数据,同时考虑了日冕物质抛射(CME)和同向相互作用地区(CIR)分别引发风暴。为了对模型进行独立测试,从模型实施期间使用的数据集中排除了考虑用于验证的风暴期,并将结果与​​观测值,月中值和国际参考电离层(IRI-2016)预测进行了比较。以GPS TEC为参考,在六个待验证的风暴期进行的统计分析表明,ANN模型的精度分别比EOF,NLRA和IRI模型高10%,26%和58%。进一步发现,EOF模型分别比NLRA和IRI模型好15%和44%,而NLRA比IRI好25%。另一方面,还参考以每月中值TEC(MM TEC)表示的背景电离层讨论了结果,并提供了统计数据。此外,突出显示了每种模型的优点和缺点。 (C)2019 COSPAR。由Elsevier Ltd.出版。保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Advances in space research》 |2019年第10期|3102-3118|共17页
  • 作者单位

    South African Natl Space Agcy SANSA Space Sci, POB 32, ZA-7200 Hermanus, South Africa|Rhodes Univ, Dept Phys & Elect, ZA-6139 Grahamstown, South Africa|Univ Rwanda, Coll Sci & Technol, Dept Phys, Kigali 3900, Rwanda;

    South African Natl Space Agcy SANSA Space Sci, POB 32, ZA-7200 Hermanus, South Africa|Rhodes Univ, Dept Phys & Elect, ZA-6139 Grahamstown, South Africa;

    Inst Atmospher Phys CAS, Bocni 2 1401, Prague 14131 4, Czech Republic;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    TEC; Geomagnetic storms; EOFs; NLRA; ANNs; IRI;

    机译:TEC;地磁风暴;EOF;NLRA;人工神经网络;IRI;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号