首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Environmental Research >Life cycle assessment as a tool for controlling the development of technical activities: application to the remediation of a site contaminated by sulfur
【24h】

Life cycle assessment as a tool for controlling the development of technical activities: application to the remediation of a site contaminated by sulfur

机译:生命周期评估作为控制技术活动发展的工具:应用于补救被硫污染的场所

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The objective of this study is to show how a life cycle assessment approach can be used to direct the development of technical activities according to environmental considerations. The case study deals with the remediation of a soil contaminated by sulfur in an industrial context. The environmental merits of four treatment techniques are compared by taking into account the raw materials and energy consumption, air and water emissions and waste production. First results are discussed criterion by criterion. It is shown that bio-leaching is the most energy-consuming technique, whereas liming requires the highest quantity of materials. Furthermore, results related to atmospheric emissions highlight the importance of transportation operations in the environmental balance especially in the case of offsite landfilling. As regards waste production, treatment techniques may be divided into two groups: on the one hand, liming and onsite containment which lead to great quantities stored onsite, on the other hand, offsite landfilling and bio-leaching for which waste is transported out of the site. Then, a multicriteria analysis enables to aggregate inventory results, avoiding compensation phenomena. Based on this analysis, onsite containment appears to be the most environmentally-friendly technique, whereas bio-leaching and offsite landfilling result in the most important environmental burdens.
机译:这项研究的目的是说明如何根据环境因素使用生命周期评估方法来指导技术活动的发展。案例研究涉及工业环境中被硫污染的土壤的修复。通过考虑原材料和能源消耗,空气和水的排放以及废物的产生,比较了四种处理技术的环境优点。逐个标准地讨论了第一结果。结果表明,生物浸出是最耗能的技术,而撒石灰则需要使用最多量的材料。此外,与大气排放有关的结果突显了运输运营在环境平衡中的重要性,尤其是在异地填埋的情况下。关于废物产生,处理技术可分为两类:一方面是撒石灰和现场围堵,这导致大量储存在现场;另一方面,是在现场进行垃圾掩埋和生物浸出,将废物从垃圾场运出。现场。然后,通过多标准分析可以汇总库存结果,避免出现补偿现象。根据此分析,现场围堵似乎是最环保的技术,而生物浸出和异地填埋则导致最重要的环境负担。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号