首页> 外文期刊>Advances in civil engineering >Comparative Study on the Test Method for Tensile Elastic Modulus of Rock Materials
【24h】

Comparative Study on the Test Method for Tensile Elastic Modulus of Rock Materials

机译:岩石材料拉伸弹性模量试验方法的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Rock material has different mechanical behaviors under compressive and tensile loading. Correspondingly, there are two types of elastic modulus: compressive elastic modulus E-c and tensile elastic modulus E-t, respectively. To distinguish which indirect test methodology, including three-points bending test and Brazilian disc test, is more suitable to measure the tensile elastic modulus E-t of rock materials, a series of uniaxial compressive test (UCT), direct tensile test (DTT), three-points bending test, and Brazilian disc test are performed for three typical types of rock: marble, granite, and sandstone. Comparative investigation on the reliability of measurement results of tensile elastic modulus E-t is systematically conducted. Finally, it is found that Brazilian disc test could be a suitable method to measure tensile elastic modulus of rock materials, due to the excellent agreement with that measured by DTT and the simplicity of sample preparation, as well as test operation.
机译:岩石材料在压缩和拉伸负载下具有不同的机械行为。相应地,有两种类型的弹性模量:压缩弹性模量E-C和拉伸弹性模量E-T。区分哪种间接测试方法,包括三分弯曲试验和巴西圆盘测试,更适合测量岩石材料的拉伸弹性模量等,一系列单轴压缩试验(UCT),直接拉伸试验(DTT),三个为三种典型类型的岩石进行弯曲试验和巴西圆盘测试,大理石,花岗岩和砂岩。系统进行了对拉伸弹性模量E-T测量结果可靠性的比较研究。最后,发现巴西圆盘测试可以是测量岩石材料拉伸弹性模量的合适方法,这是由于DTT测量的优异一致性以及样品制备的简单性,以及试验操作。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Advances in civil engineering》 |2019年第9期|3161953.1-3161953.18|共18页
  • 作者

    Zhang Yan; Yu Dawei;

  • 作者单位

    Wuhan Univ Technol Sch Safety Sci & Emergency Management Wuhan 430070 Hubei Peoples R China;

    China Univ Geosci Beijing Dept Civil Engn Beijing 100083 Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号