首页> 外文期刊>ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems >Internet-scale Insecurity of Consumer Internet of Things: An Empirical Measurements Perspective
【24h】

Internet-scale Insecurity of Consumer Internet of Things: An Empirical Measurements Perspective

机译:消费者互联网的互联网规模不安全:经验测量的视角

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The number of Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices actively communicating across the Internet is continually increasing, as these devices are deployed across a variety of sectors, constantly transferring private data across the Internet. Due to the extensive deployment of such devices, the continuous discovery and persistence of IoT-centric vulnerabilities in protocols, applications, hardware, and the improper management of such IoT devices has resulted in the rampant, uncontrolled spread of malware threatening consumer IoT devices. To this end, this work adopts a novel, macroscopic methodology for fingerprinting Internet-scale compromised IoT devices, revealing crucial cyber threat intelligence on the insecurity of consumer IoT devices. By developing data-driven techniques rooted in machine learning methods and analyzing 3.6 TB of network traffic data, we discover 855,916 compromised IP addresses, with 310,164 fingerprinted as IoT. Further analysis reveals China and Brazil to be hosting the most significant population of compromised IoT devices (100,000 and 55,000, respectively). Additionally, we provide a longitudinal analysis on data from one year ago against this work, revealing the evolving trends of IoT exploitation, such as the increased number of vendors targeted by malware, rising from 50 to 131. Moreover, countries such as China (420% increased infected IoT count) and Indonesia (177% increased infected IoT count) have seen notably high increases in infection rates. Last, we compare our geographic results against Global Cybersecurity Index (GCI) ratings, verifying that countries with high GCI ratings, such as the Netherlands and Germany, had relatively low infection rates. However, upon further inspection, we find that the GCI rate does not accurately represent the consumer IoT market, with countries such as China and Russia being rated with "high" CGI scores, yet hosting a large population of infected consumer IoT devices.
机译:随着这些设备在各种扇区上部署,随着这些设备在互联网上跨越私有数据,这些设备的互联网(IOT)设备的数量不断增加。由于此类设备的广泛部署,因此协议,应用程序,硬件和不正当管理中的IoT形漏洞的连续发现和持久性导致了恶意软件威胁消费物联网设备的猖獗,不受控制的扩散。为此,这项工作采用了一种新颖的宏观方法,用于指纹互联网级受损的物联网设备,揭示了消费物联网设备的不安全感的至关重要的网络威胁情报。通过开发带有机器学习方法的数据驱动技术和分析3.6 TB的网络流量数据,我们发现855,916个受损的IP地址,310,164指纹作为物联网。进一步的分析揭示了中国和巴西举办了最重要的IOT设备(分别为100,000和55,000)。此外,我们在一年前的工作中提供了对数据的纵向分析,揭示了IOT开发的不断发展趋势,例如由恶意软件所针对的供应商增加,从50到131增加。此外,中国等国家(420 %升高的感染物联网数量增加)和印度尼西亚(感染的物理次数增加177%)显着高增加了感染率。最后,我们将我们的地理结果与全球网络安全指数(GCI)的评级进行比较,验证了GCI评级高的国家,如荷兰和德国,感染率相对较低。然而,在进一步检查后,我们发现GCI率不准确地代表消费者物联网市场,与中国和俄罗斯等国家被评为“高”CGI评分,但举办了大量受感染的消费物联网设备。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号