首页> 外文期刊>ACM transactions on privacy and security >The Dilemma of User Engagement in Privacy Notices: Effects of Interaction Modes and Habituation on User Attention
【24h】

The Dilemma of User Engagement in Privacy Notices: Effects of Interaction Modes and Habituation on User Attention

机译:隐私声明中用户参与的困境:交互模式与习惯对用户注意的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Privacy notices and consent forms are the means of conveying privacy policy information to users. In Europe, a valid consent needs to be confirmed by a clear affirmative action. Despite previous research, it is not yet clear whether user engagement with consent forms via different types of interactions for confirming consent may play a significant role in effectively drawing user attention to the content, even after repeated exposure. We investigate, in a laboratory study, how different types of interactions that engage users with consent forms differ in terms of their effectiveness, efficiency, and user satisfaction. In addition, we examine if and how habituation affects user attenbon and satisfaction, and the time they spend on giving their consent. We conducted a controlled experiment with 80 participants in four different groups where people either were engaged actively with the policy content via Drag and Drop (DAD), Swipe, or Checkboxes, or were not actively engaged with the content (as the control condition) in a first-exposure phase and in a habituation phase. We measured user attention to consent forms along multiple dimensions, including direct, objective measurements and indirect, self-reported measures. Our results show that the different types of interactions may affect user attention to certain parts of policy information. In particular, the DAD action results in significantly more user attention to the data items compared to other groups. However, with repeated exposure to consent forms, the difference disappears. We conclude that user engagement with policy content needs to be designed with care, so that attention to substantial policy information is increased and not negatively affected.
机译:隐私声明和同意表格是将隐私政策信息传达给用户的手段。在欧洲,需要通过明确的肯定行动确认有效的同意。尽管先前的研究,但尚不清楚通过不同类型的相互作用的同意表格的用户参与是否可以在有效地绘制用户注意内容中,即使在重复曝光之后也可能发挥重要作用。我们在实验室研究中调查,如何在其有效性,效率和用户满意度方面不同类型的相互作用。此外,我们检查是否以及习惯如何影响用户的八孔和满意度,以及他们在提供同意的时间。我们在四个不同的群体中进行了一个受控实验,其中四个不同的群体,人们要么通过拖放(爸爸),刷卡或复选框积极地与策略内容一起参与,或者没有积极与内容(作为控制条件)一起参与第一曝光阶段和习惯阶段。我们测量了用户对同意形式沿多个维度的注意力,包括直接,客观测量和间接,自我报告的措施。我们的研究结果表明,不同类型的互动可能会影响用户对政策信息某些部分的关注。特别是,与其他组相比,爸爸动作导致对数据项的注意力显着。但是,随着同意形式的重复曝光,差异消失了。我们得出结论,使用与策略内容的用户参与需要小心设计,因此对大量政策信息的注意力增加而不会受到负面影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号