Comment on the IASB Discussion Paper âPreliminary Views on Revenue Recognition in Contracts with Customersâ

Jan Martona*  Alfred Wagenhoferb

首页> 外文期刊>Accounting in Europe >Comment on the IASB Discussion Paper âPreliminary Views on Revenue Recognition in Contracts with Customersâ

【24h】

Comment on the IASB Discussion Paper âPreliminary Views on Revenue Recognition in Contracts with Customersâ

机译：评论IASB讨论文件“关于与客户签订合同中的收入确认的初步观点”

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

来源
《Accounting in Europe》 |2010年第1期|p.3-13|共11页
作者
Jan Martona* Alfred Wagenhoferb;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词
入库时间 2022-08-18 00:59:50

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. The IASB's Discussion Paper on the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting:A Commentary and Research Review [J] . Elizabeth A. Gordon, Jannis Bischof, Holger Daske, Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting . 2015,第1期

机译：IASB关于财务报告概念框架的讨论文件：评论和研究评论
2. Overview and Analysis of the IASB Extractive Activities Discussion Paper: Recommendations and Implications for Oil and Gas Accounting and Reporting [J] . Charlotte J. Wright, Christopher J. Skousen Petroleum Accounting and Financial Management Journal . 2010,第3期

机译：IASB采掘活动讨论文件的概述和分析：油气会计和报告的建议和含义
3. âMindful of the Sacrifices Borne by Our Ancestorsâ: Terror, Historical Consciousness, and the Slave Sublime This paper benefited greatly from discussions with Peter Rachleff and the Mellon Mays Undergraduate Fellows at Macalester College. I am also grateful to Stephen Eric Bronner, Leah Njoya, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions at various stages in the writing process. View all notes [J] . Wairimu Njoyaa New Political Science . 2010,第4期

机译：“铭记我们祖先的牺牲”：恐怖，历史意识和奴隶崇高精神与彼得·拉赫列夫和麦卡莱斯特学院的梅隆·梅斯大学本科生的讨论极大地受益于本文。我还要感谢Stephen Eric Bronner，Leah Njoya和两位匿名审稿人在写作过程中各个阶段的意见和建议。查看所有笔记
4. Authors response to reviewer comments on paper draft "Laboratory Testing of OCTG grades UNS N08028 and UNS N08029"(Doc number C2017-8806) Thank you for the comments from the reviewer! The technical comments and questions do help us to make clear discussion in the paper. The "potential measurement" will be considered in our future studies. [C] . Corrosion conference and expo . 2017

机译：作者对审稿人对“ OCTG等级UNS N08028和UNS N08029的OCTG实验室测试”草案的评论的答复（文档编号C2017-8806）感谢审稿人的评论！技术注释和问题确实有助于我们在本文中进行清楚的讨论。在未来的研究中将考虑“潜在测量”。
5. Financial statement preparers' revenue decisions: Accuracy in applying rules-based standards and the IASB-FASB revenue recognition model [D] . McCarthy, Mary 2012

机译：财务报表编制者的收入决策：运用基于规则的标准和IASB-FASB收入确认模型的准确性
6. New contract for medical assistants: discussion paper [O] . 1977

机译：医疗助理新合同：讨论文件
7. Comment on the IASB Discussion Paper . “Preliminary Views on Revenue Recognition in Contracts with Customers” [O] . Marton Jan, Wagenhofer Alfred 2009

机译：评论IasB讨论文件。 “与客户合约收益确认的初步意见”
8. Copyright Law Revision, Part 4: Further Discussions and Comments on Preliminary Draft for Revised U.S. Copyright Law [R] . 1964

机译：版权法修订，第4部分：关于修订后的美国版权法初稿的进一步讨论和评论

Comment on the IASB Discussion Paper âPreliminary Views on Revenue Recognition in Contracts with Customersâ

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅

Comment on the IASB Discussion Paper âPreliminary Views on Revenue Recognition in Contracts with Customersâ