首页> 外文期刊>Accounting and Business Research >Financial instruments in non-financial firms: what do we know?
【24h】

Financial instruments in non-financial firms: what do we know?

机译:非金融公司的金融工具:我们知道什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Accounting for financial instruments is one of the most controversial standard setting issues. Attempts by standard setters to expand the scope of fair value measurement provoked fierce opposition from preparers, in particular from the financial industry but also, albeit less frequently and less scathingly, from non-financial firms. Academic research could help to bring the discussion onto a more objective level. Most of the existing research focuses on the financial industry and uses US disclosure data from the 1990s. More recent papers use recognition and measurement data from IFRS financial statements, again primarily from the financial industry. This paper provides novel evidence on the relevance of financial instruments for non-financial firms of the STOXX Europe 600 Index. The results in particular refute the myths that fair value measurement of financial instruments is pervasive and that many fair value measurements are of the problematic ‘level 3’ quality. The empirical evidence forms the background for a survey of the small body of existing research on the effects of accounting standards relating to financial instruments on non-financial firms. This survey covers research on the effects on risk management, on the volatility of cash flows and earnings, on earnings management and on the effects on user decisions. Both in the empirical sections and in the survey sections, I identify a number of areas for further research to overcome the poor current state of knowledge.View full textDownload full textKeywordsfinancial instruments accounting, fair value measurement, IAS 39, IFRS 7, non-financial firmsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2012.681859
机译:金融工具的会计处理是最具争议的标准制定问题之一。标准制定者试图扩大公允价值计量范围的尝试引起了准备者的强烈反对,特别是来自金融业的准备者,但也引起了非金融公司的反对,尽管这种反对的频率降低了,也没有那么严厉。学术研究可以帮助使讨论更客观。现有的大多数研究都集中在金融业,并使用1990年代的美国公开数据。最近的论文也使用了主要来自金融业的IFRS财务报表中的确认和计量数据。本文为STOXX欧洲600指数中非金融公司的金融工具的相关性提供了新颖的证据。结果尤其驳斥了这样的神话,即金融工具的公允价值计量无处不在,并且许多公允价值计量具有问题的“ 3级”质量。经验证据构成了对有关金融工具会计准则对非金融公司影响的现有研究的一小部分进行调查的背景。这项调查涵盖以下方面的研究:风险管理,现金流量和收益的波动性,收益管理以及对用户决策的影响。在经验部分和调查部分中,我都确定了一些需要进一步研究的领域,以克服当前知识水平较差的情况。查看全文下载全文关键字金融工具会计,公允价值计量,IAS 39,IFRS 7,非金融firmsRelated var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2012.681859

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号