...
首页> 外文期刊>Accounting and finance >Are all dividends created equal? Australian evidence using dividend-increase track records
【24h】

Are all dividends created equal? Australian evidence using dividend-increase track records

机译:所有股息均相等吗?澳大利亚使用股息增加追踪记录的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

AbstractRecent research indicates that the signal sent by a dividend change is more powerful for longer histories of unchanged dividends. We study the dividend history of Australian firms to investigate whether the signalling power of a dividend increase varies with the frequency of repetition. We find that the first three consecutive dividend increases are associated with significantly positive abnormal returns, and subsequent increases are generally not significant, even after controlling for the interaction effect with the simultaneously announced earnings information. Our results support the hypothesis that repeating a dividend increase eventually leads to a reputation for further increases and weakens the value of subsequent increases as a means of disseminating management's private information.
机译:摘要最近的研究表明,对于较长的未分配股息历史而言,股息变化发送的信号更强大。我们研究了澳大利亚公司的股息历史,以研究股息增加的信号传递能力是否随重复频率而变化。我们发现,即使在控制了同时公布的收益信息的相互作用影响之后,前三个连续的股利增加与明显的正收益相关,而随后的股利通常并不重要。我们的结果支持以下假设:重复增加股息最终会导致进一步增加的声誉,并削弱随后增加的价值,以此作为传播管理层私人信息的手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号