首页> 外文期刊>Accountancy >LENNARTZ SHOCK
【24h】

LENNARTZ SHOCK

机译:伦纳茨电击

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A surprising adverse decision, for charities, has been issued by the European Court of Justice (C-515/07) in the case of VNL. This arose from a referral from the Dutch High Court concerning an organisation that sought to apply the Lennartz approach to all costs, rather than restricting them to capital costs. The Lennartz arrangement allows for VAT on costs relating to a mixture of taxable and non-business activities to be fully recoverable at the outset, with a deemed output tax value being associated, periodically, with any non-business use. HM Revenue & Customs' reluctant policy is to acknowledge that this applies, and the system is technically available for charities to use on capital projects. The Dutch court did not appear to disagree with that, insofar as capital goods were concerned, but sought guidance on non-capital costs.
机译:欧洲法院(V-515 / 07)针对VNL发布了一项针对慈善机构的令人惊讶的不利决定。这是由于荷兰高等法院转介了一个组织,该组织试图将Lennartz方法应用于所有成本,而不是将其限制在资本成本上。 Lennartz安排允许从一开始就可以完全收回与应税活动和非商业活动混合的相关费用的增值税,并且视作销项的增值税价值会定期与任何非商业用途相关联。 HM Revenue&Customs的勉强政策是承认这适用,并且该系统在技术上可用于慈善机构用于基本建设项目。就资本货物而言,荷兰法院似乎没有不同意这一观点,但它寻求非资本成本方面的指导。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Accountancy》 |2009年第1389期|76-76|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号