首页> 外文期刊>Accountancy >UPPER TRIBUNAL REVERSES FTT IN HOLIDAY LET CASE
【24h】

UPPER TRIBUNAL REVERSES FTT IN HOLIDAY LET CASE

机译:假日假案中上法庭逆转FTT

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Upper Tribunal has overturned a First Tier Tribunal decision on business property relief (BPR) in CRC v Lockyer and Robertson (as the personal representatives of Pawson, deceased) ruling that BPR was not available on the deceased's holiday bungalow as it had been held 'mainly as an investment'. The Upper Tribunal's decision had been eagerly awaited as Lockyer and Robertson, representing the deceased, had had a somewhat surprising victory at the FTT; raising the possibility that furnished holiday lets, where only minimal services were provided, would qualify for BPR.
机译:上级法庭在CRC诉Lockyer和Robertson(作为已故的Pawson的私人代表)中推翻了第一级法庭关于商业财产救济(BPR)的裁决,裁定死者的度假别墅不提供BPR,因为该诉讼已举行。主要作为投资”。上级法庭的决定备受期待,因为代表死者的洛克耶和罗伯逊在FTT上取得了令人惊讶的胜利。增加了仅提供最少服务的带家具假日出租有资格获得BPR的可能性。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Accountancy》 |2013年第1435期|32-32|共1页
  • 作者

    Julie Clift;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号