首页> 外文期刊>Accountancy >GOING NOWHERE?
【24h】

GOING NOWHERE?

机译:到哪里去?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Restrictive covenants are notoriously difficult to enforce. The starting point is that a contractual term that attempts to limit an employee's ability to work elsewhere after their employment has ended is an unfair restraint of trade and, as a matter of public policy, should not be enforced. However, there are no such public policy difficulties if the contract of employment is still continuing. Can an employer keep the contract of employment alive despite an employee's clear resignation and refusal to work? That was the main question in the recent case of Sunrise Brokers LLP v Rodgers [2014] EWHC 2633 (QB).
机译:众所周知,限制性盟约很难执行。出发点是,合同条款试图限制雇员在雇用结束后在其他地方工作的能力,这是对贸易的不公平限制,从公共政策的角度来看,不应强制执行。但是,如果雇佣合同仍在继续,就不会有这样的公共政策困难。尽管员工明确辞职并拒绝工作,但雇主能否维持雇佣合同?这是最近的Sunrise Brokers LLP诉Rodgers [2014] EWHC 2633(QB)案中的主要问题。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Accountancy》 |2014年第1454期|43-43|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号