首页> 外文期刊>Accountancy >Tax filing penalties when self assessment not required
【24h】

Tax filing penalties when self assessment not required

机译:不需要自我评估时的纳税申报罚款

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In R & C Commrs v Goldsmith [2019] UKUT 0325 (TCC) [2019] BTC 527 (https://library.croneri.co.uk/cch_uk/btc/2019-btc-527), the Upper Tribunal decided that David Goldsmith had to pay two £100 penalties for the late filing of personal tax returns. While it is unfortunate for the taxpayer that he lost his case, given the relatively low level of penalties, it could be asked why HMRC bothered to appeal the First Tier Tribunal (FTT) decision ([2018] TC 06284 (https://library.croneri.co.uk/cch_uk/btc/2018-tc-06284)) and why anyone should be interested in the decision. The answer is the potential repercussions for other taxpayers. Goldsmith was not registered for self assessment and was instead taxed through PAYE. In 2011-12 and 2012-13, he received employment income and taxable employment and support allowance (ESA). For reasons that are unclear the tax code provided by HMRC required Goldsmith’s employer to deduct his full personal allowance from his employment income rather than allocate some of the allowance against his ESA.
机译:在R&C Commrs诉Goldsmith [2019] UKUT 0325(TCC)[2019] BTC 527(https://library.croneri.co.uk/cch_uk/btc/2019-btc-527)中,上法庭裁定大卫戈德史密斯必须为迟交个人纳税申报单支付两项100英镑的罚款。虽然对于纳税人来说不幸的是他败诉了,但鉴于处罚水平相对较低,但有人可能会问为什么HMRC烦恼对第一级法庭(FTT)的决定提出上诉([2018] TC 06284(https:// library .croneri.co.uk / cch_​​uk / btc / 2018-tc-06284)),以及为什么有人对该决定感兴趣。答案是对其他纳税人的潜在影响。戈德史密斯未进行自我评估注册,而是通过PAYE征税。在2011-12年和2012-13年,他获得了就业收入以及应税的就业和支持津贴(ESA)。出于不清楚的原因,英国皇家税务与海关总署(HMRC)提供的税法要求戈德史密斯的雇主从其就业收入中扣除其全部个人津贴,而不是将部分津贴分配给他的ESA。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Accountancy》 |2020年第1期|1-7|共7页
  • 作者

    Meg Wilson;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号