首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis & Prevention >The influence of vehicle damage on injury severity of drivers in head-on motor vehicle crashes
【24h】

The influence of vehicle damage on injury severity of drivers in head-on motor vehicle crashes

机译:车辆损坏对迎头机动车碰撞中驾驶员伤害严重性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Data from crashes investigated through the Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (C1REN) Program were used to assess differences in injury patterns, severity, and sources for drivers, protected by safety belts and deploying steering wheel air bags, in head-on frontal impacts. We studied whether exterior vehicle damage with a different distribution (wide vs. narrow) across the front vehicle plane influenced injury characteristics. Drivers from both impact types were similar on the basis of demographic characteristics (except age), restraint use, and vehicle characteristics. There were significant differences in the type of object contacted and intrusion into the passenger compartment at the driver's seat location. The mean delta V (based on the kilometers per hour change in velocity during the impact) was similar for drivers in both (wide vs. narrow) impact types. There were no significant differences in injury patterns and sources except that drivers in wide impacts were almost 4 times more likely (odds ratio (OR) = 3.81,95% confidence limits (CL) 1.26, 11.5) to have an abbreviated injury scale (A1S) 3 serious or greater severity head injury. Adjusted odds ratios showed that drivers in wide impacts were less likely (OR = 0.54,95% CI 0.37,0.79) to have severe injury (based on injury severity score (ISS) > 25) when controlling for intrusion, vehicle body type, vehicle curb weight, age, proper safety belt use, and delta V. Drivers with intrusion into their position or who were driving a passenger vehicle were almost twice more likely to have severe injury, regardless of whether the frontal plane damage distribution was wide or narrow. Our study supports that the type of damage distribution across the frontal plane may be an important crash characteristic to consider when studying drivers injured in head-on motor vehicle crashes.
机译:通过碰撞伤害研究与工程网络(C1REN)计划调查的碰撞数据被用来评估驾驶员正面伤害时在伤害模式,严重性和驾驶员来源方面的差异,驾驶员受到安全带保护并部署了方向盘安全气囊。我们研究了在前部车辆平面上具有不同分布(宽与窄)的外部车辆损坏是否影响了伤害特性。根据人口统计特征(年龄除外),约束使用和车辆特征,两种撞击类型的驾驶员相似。接触物体的类型和在驾驶员座位位置侵入乘客舱的类型存在显着差异。在两种(宽或窄)碰撞类型中,驾驶员的平均变化量V(基于碰撞过程中每小时速度的公里数变化)相似。伤害模式和来源没有显着差异,只是受到广泛影响的驾驶员具有简化的伤害量表(A1S)的可能性要高出将近4倍(几率(OR)= 3.81,95%置信极限(CL)1.26、11.5)。 )3严重或更高严重度的头部受伤。调整后的优势比表明,​​在控制闯入,车身类型,车辆时,大范围撞击的驾驶员发生严重伤害的可能性较小(OR = 0.54,95%CI 0.37,0.79)(基于伤害严重度得分(ISS)> 25)遏制体重,年龄,安全带的正确使用和差值V。闯入位置或驾驶乘用车的驾驶员遭受重伤的几率要高出将近两倍,而无论前额平面损伤分布是宽还是窄。我们的研究支持,在研究因正面撞车而受伤的驾驶员时,应考虑到额叶上方的伤害分布类型是重要的撞车特征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号