首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis & Prevention >Risky riding: Naturalistic methods comparing safety behavior from conventional bicycle riders and electric bike riders
【24h】

Risky riding: Naturalistic methods comparing safety behavior from conventional bicycle riders and electric bike riders

机译:冒险骑行:比较传统自行车骑手和电动自行车骑手安全行为的自然方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As electric bicycles (e-bikes) have emerged as a new transportation mode, their role in transportation systems and their impact on users have become important issues for policy makers and engineers. Little safety-related research has been conducted in North America or Europe because of their relatively small numbers. This work describes the results of a naturalistic GPS-based safety study between regular bicycle (i.e., standard bicycle) and e-bike riders in the context of a unique bikesharing system that allows comparisons between instrumented bike technologies. We focus on rider safety behavior under four situations: (1) riding in the correct direction on directional roadway segments, (2) speed on on-road and shared use paths, (3) stopping behavior at stop-controlled intersections, and (4) stopping behavior at signalized intersections. We find that, with few exceptions, riders of e-bike behave very similarly to riders of bicycles. Violation rates were very high for both vehicles. Riders of regular bicycles and e-bikes both ride wrong-way on 45% and 44% of segments, respectively. We find that average on-road speeds of e-bike riders (13.3 kph) were higher than regular bicyclists (10.4 kph) but shared use path (greenway) speeds of e-bike riders (11.0 kph) were lower than regular bicyclists (12.6 kph); both significantly different at >95% confidence. At stop control intersections, both bicycle and e-bike riders violate the stop signs at the similar rate with bicycles violating stop signs at a slightly higher rate at low speed thresholds (similar to 80% violations at 6 kph, 40% violations at 11 kph). Bicycles and e-bikes violate traffic signals at similar rates (70% violation rate). These findings suggest that, among the same population of users, e-bike riders exhibit nearly identical safety behavior as regular bike riders and should be regulated in similar ways. Users of both technologies have very high violation rates of traffic control devices and interventions should occur to improve compliance. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:随着电动自行车(e-bikes)成为一种新的交通方式,其在交通系统中的作用及其对用户的影响已成为政策制定者和工程师的重要问题。由于数量相对较少,因此在北美或欧洲很少进行与安全相关的研究。这项工作描述了在独特的自行车共享系统的背景下,常规自行车(即标准自行车)和电动自行车骑手之间基于GPS的自然主义安全性研究的结果,该系统允许在仪表化自行车技术之间进行比较。我们将重点放在四种情况下的骑手安全行为上:(1)在有方向的路段上以正确的方向骑行;(2)在道路上和共享使用路径上的速度;(3)在停车控制交叉口处的停车行为;以及(4 )在信号交叉口停止行为。我们发现,除少数例外,电动自行车的骑手的行为与自行车的骑手的行为非常相似。两种车辆的违规率都很高。普通自行车和电动自行车的骑车人分别在45%和44%的路段上骑错路。我们发现,电动自行车骑手的平均行车速度(13.3 kph)高于普通自行车骑行者(10.4 kph),但电动自行车骑手的共享使用路径(绿道)速度(11.0 kph)低于普通自行车骑手(12.6 kph) kph);两者均以> 95%的置信度显着不同。在停车控制交叉口,自行车和电动自行车的驾驶员违反停车标志的比率均相似,而在低速阈值时自行车违反停车标志的比率略高(类似于在6 kph时违反80%,在11 kph时违反40%) )。自行车和电动自行车违反交通信号的比率相似(违规率为70%)。这些发现表明,在相同的用户群体中,电动自行车骑手表现出与普通自行车骑手几乎相同的安全行为,并应以类似方式进行监管。两种技术的用户都有非常高的流量控制设备违规率,应该采取干预措施以提高合规性。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号