...
首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis & Prevention >Longitudinal control behaviour: Analysis and modelling based on experimental surveys in Italy and the UK
【24h】

Longitudinal control behaviour: Analysis and modelling based on experimental surveys in Italy and the UK

机译:纵向控制行为:基于意大利和英国的实验调查进行分析和建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper analyses driving behaviour in car-following conditions, based on extensive individual vehicle data collected during experimental field surveys carried out in Italy and the UK. The aim is to contribute to identify simple evidence to be exploited in the ongoing process of driving assistance and automation which, in turn, would reduce rear-end crashes. In particular, identification of differences and similarities in observed car-following behaviours for different samples of drivers could justify common tuning, at a European or worldwide level, of a technological solution aimed at active safety, or, in the event of differences, could suggest the most critical aspects to be taken into account for localisation or customisation of driving assistance solutions. Without intending to be exhaustive, this paper moves one step in this direction. Indeed, driving behaviour and human errors are considered to be among the main crash contributory factors, and a promising approach for safety improvement is the progressive introduction of increasing levels of driving automation in next-generation vehicles, according to the active/preventive safety approach. However, the more advanced the system, the more complex will be the integration in the vehicle, and the interaction with the driver may sometimes become unproductive, or risky, should the driver be removed from the driving control loop. Thus, implementation of these systems will require the interaction of human driving logics with automation logics and then an enhanced ability in modelling drivers' behaviour. This will allow both higher active-safety levels and higher user acceptance to be achieved, thus ensuring that the driver is always in the control loop, even if his/her role is limited to supervising the automatic logic. Currently, the driving mode most targeted by driving assistance systems is longitudinal driving. This is required in various driving conditions, among which car-following assumes key importance because of the huge number of rear-end crashes.
机译:本文基于在意大利和英国进行的实地调查收集的大量单个车辆数据,分析了在跟车情况下的驾驶行为。目的是帮助确定简单的证据,以在正在进行的驾驶辅助和自动化过程中加以利用,从而减少追尾事故。特别是,对于不同的驾驶员样本,在观察到的跟车行为上的差异和相似之处的识别可以证明在欧洲或全球范围内针对主动安全性的技术解决方案进行通用调校是合理的,或者,如果存在差异,则可能表明本地化或定制驾驶辅助解决方案时要考虑的最关键方面。并非详尽无遗,本文朝这个方向迈出了一步。确实,驾驶行为和人为错误被认为是造成撞车的主要因素,根据主动/预防安全方法,提高安全性的一种有前途的方法是逐步在下一代车辆中引入不断提高的驾驶自动化水平。然而,系统越先进,车辆中的集成就越复杂,并且如果将驾驶员从驾驶控制回路中移开,与驾驶员的互动有时可能会变得毫无用处或具有风险。因此,这些系统的实现将需要人工驾驶逻辑与自动化逻辑的交互,然后需要增强对驾驶员行为建模的能力。这样既可以达到更高的主动安全级别,也可以达到更高的用户接受度,从而即使驾驶员的角色仅限于监督自动逻辑,也可以确保驾驶员始终处于控制回路中。当前,驾驶辅助系统最关注的驾驶模式是纵向驾驶。这在各种驾驶条件下都是必需的,其中,由于大量的追尾事故,追随汽车成为关键。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号