首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis & Prevention >Differences in glance behavior between drivers using a rearview camera, parking sensor system, both technologies, or no technology during low-speed parking maneuvers
【24h】

Differences in glance behavior between drivers using a rearview camera, parking sensor system, both technologies, or no technology during low-speed parking maneuvers

机译:在低速停车操作期间,使用后视摄像头,停车传感器系统,两种技术或不使用任何技术的驾驶员之间的扫视行为差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study characterized the use of various fields of view during low-speed parking maneuvers by drivers with a rearview camera, a sensor system, a camera and sensor system combined, or neither technology. Participants performed four different low-speed parking maneuvers five times. Glances to different fields of view the second time through the four maneuvers were coded along with the glance locations at the onset of the audible warning from the sensor system and immediately after the warning for participants in the sensor and camera-plus-sensor conditions. Overall, the results suggest that information from cameras and/or sensor systems is used in place of mirrors and shoulder glances. Participants with a camera, sensor system, or both technologies looked over their shoulders significantly less than participants without technology. Participants with cameras (camera and camera-plus-sensor conditions) used their mirrors significantly less compared with participants without cameras (no-technology and sensor conditions). Participants in the camera-plus-sensor condition looked at the center console/camera display for a smaller percentage of the time during the low-speed maneuvers than participants in the camera condition and glanced more frequently to the center console/camera display immediately after the warning from the sensor system compared with the frequency of glances to this location at warning onset. Although this increase was not statistically significant, the pattern suggests that participants in the camera-plus-sensor condition may have used the warning as a cue to look at the camera display. The observed differences in glance behavior between study groups were illustrated by relating it to the visibility of a 12-15-month-old child-size object. These findings provide evidence that drivers adapt their glance behavior during low-speed parking maneuvers following extended use of rearview cameras and parking sensors, and suggest that other technologies which augment the driving task may do the same. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:这项研究的特征在于,驾驶员在低速停车操作中使用了后视摄像头,传感器系统,摄像头和传感器系统相结合或两者都不用的情况下,在各种视野中的使用情况。参与者五次执行了四个不同的低速停车操作。第二次通过这四个动作对不同视野的扫视以及在传感器系统发出声音警报时以及在传感器和摄像头加传感器条件下的参与者发出警报之后立即将扫视位置与位置编码在一起。总体而言,结果表明,使用了来自照相机和/或传感器系统的信息来代替镜子和肩膀。具有摄像头,传感器系统或同时具有这两种技术的参与者的视线要比没有技术的参与者的视线少。与没有摄像机(没有技术和传感器条件)的参与者相比,有摄像机的参与者(摄像机和摄像机+传感器条件)的镜子使用率大大降低。与低速操作相比,参加摄像机加传感器状态的参与者在低速操纵中观看中控台/摄像机显示的时间所占的时间比例要短于在参加低速操纵期间的参与者,并且在运动后立即转向中控台/照相机显示屏。来自传感器系统的警告与警告开始时扫视该位置的频率相比。尽管这种增加在统计上并不显着,但该模式表明,摄像头加传感器条件下的参与者可能已将警告用作查看摄像头显示的提示。研究组之间观察到的扫视行为差异通过将其与12-15个月大的儿童大小的物体的可见性相关来说明。这些发现提供了证据,表明驾驶员在扩展使用后视摄像头和驻车传感器后,在低速驻车操作过程中适应了他们的扫视行为,并表明其他增加驾驶任务的技术也可以做到这一点。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号